User talk:97.77.220.86

September 2013

Hello, I'm Ginsuloft. An edit that you recently made to Transcendentalism seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Ginsuloft (talk) 14:21, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Jack Harries, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 13:07, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm DoorsAjar. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to University of Houston Sugar Land, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DoorsAjar (talk) 19:29, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ricky Dillon (September 16)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ricky Dillon.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:40, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello! 97.77.220.86, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at History of agriculture in the United States. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Fraggle81 (talk) 16:37, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edits to Club América

 Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you have posted content to the Club América article in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English. Thank you! --  Wywin (talk | contribs) 18:03, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Tedickey. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! TEDickey (talk) 14:35, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

Hello, I'm Noommos. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Alexander Glazunov, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Noom (t) 17:58, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Your edits to Pierre Corneille

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Pierre Corneille with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Pseudomonas_(talk) 16:28, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Semen analysis, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Semen analysis was changed by 97.77.220.86 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.943319 on 2013-10-16T19:23:17+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:23, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:26, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wentworth Cheswell. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Ginsuloft (talk) 14:34, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at History of Apple Inc., you may be blocked from editing. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:47, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at William R. Bennett, Jr., you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mojoworker (talk) 20:04, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

To edit, please log in.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

22:44, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
MalnadachBot (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

... discospinster _talk 20:10, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Elena of Montenegro, you may be blocked from editing. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 17:55, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Osmosis, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Osmosis was changed by 97.77.220.86 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954376 on 2013-11-13T15:10:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:10, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  —Darkwind (talk) 18:04, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

December 2013

Hello, I'm Some jerk on the Internet. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Sustainable agriculture because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The reverted edit can be found here. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 15:23, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Lugia2453. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Women's suffrage because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Lugia2453 (talk) 16:17, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Women's suffrage, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Saddhiyama (talk) 16:24, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

To edit, please log in.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

22:44, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
MalnadachBot (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:54, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Comments: Blocked for 1 week.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ricky Dillon concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ricky Dillon, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:05, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tobacco mosaic virus may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• long. The coat protein = 10212932 | pmc = 1692534 | doi = 10.1098/rstb.1999.0404 | url = | issn = }}</ref> X-ray [[fiber diffraction]] structure of the intact virus was studied based on an [[electron

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:43, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. SmartSE (talk) 18:50, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at 2013 South Asian Games, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: 2013 South Asian Games was changed by 97.77.220.86 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.880793 on 2014-03-21T18:04:26+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:04, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Squash (sport) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Squash (sport) was changed by 97.77.220.86 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.882093 on 2014-03-24T12:58:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:58, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at 666 (number). Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Poepkop (talk) 12:45, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ricky Dillon

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —Anne Delong (talk) 01:28, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

Hello, I'm PhilKnight. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Yale University, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. PhilKnight (talk) 15:11, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Self-efficacy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. A520 | Talk me away!/sign it! 15:34, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Cosmetology with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. — MusikAnimal ^talk 17:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Stanford University with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. --MelanieN (talk) 15:04, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

November 2014

Hello, I'm CanadianLinuxUser. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Joseph Strauss (engineer)— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 14:15, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Joseph Strauss (engineer) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 14:17, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sports commentator, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Sports commentator was changed by 97.77.220.86 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.86628 on 2014-11-12T16:25:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:25, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

---