Jump to content

User talk:94.197.121.89

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 2014

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Vertium. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to David Clements because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Vertium When all is said and done 22:49, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2015

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Dwpaul. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Badminton because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dwpaul Talk 13:53, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2015

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to History of EastEnders— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 22:47, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of prime numbers has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:12, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi , Your recent edit on Rishworth School has been reverted. Please note "The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article" and "Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source". Please read WP:UNSOURCED and WP:SOURCE policy. Thank you.CASSIOPEIA (talk) 15:10, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

94.197.121.89 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

If you decline this request, I shall sue Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

As per WP:NLT, you are no longer permitted to edit Wikipedia until you unconditionally withdraw your legal threat or until your legal action is complete. I am placing a block to reflect this. Yamla (talk) 14:04, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.
You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

94.197.121.89 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:54, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have not unconditionally retracted your legal threat, nor have you indicated your legal action is complete. As such, I am revoking your talk page access. You may use WP:UTRS if, but only if, you unconditionally retract your legal threat or indicate your legal action is complete. --Yamla (talk) 14:07, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]