Jump to content

User talk:93.87.33.6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Laza Kostić has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ArglebargleIV (talk) 13:30, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

[edit]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mujeres Asesinas, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.--Morenooso (talk) 13:36, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Mujeres Asesinas, you will be blocked from editing. --Morenooso (talk) 17:06, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Mujeres Asesinas, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --76.227.63.215 (talk) 12:56, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. AnomieBOT 19:15, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mujeres Asesinas, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.--Morenooso (talk) 14:26, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Mujeres Asesinas. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Three edits after last warning--Morenooso (talk) 14:48, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mujeres Asesinas. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Morenooso (talk) 14:49, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Mujeres Asesinas, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Morenooso (talk) 19:11, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked one week

[edit]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war at Mujeres Asesinas. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

EdJohnston (talk) 19:37, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

[edit]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mujeres Asesinas, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.--Morenooso (talk) 13:09, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Mujeres Asesinas. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Morenooso (talk) 13:54, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Mujeres Asesinas, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Morenooso (talk) 13:02, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cap locks

[edit]
This is a quick note to ask you to please make sure your CAP LOCKS are off when editing, so that the text does not appear as shouting (all capital letters. These caps will often lead to the text being promptly removed. Kindly Calmer Waters 15:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Calmer Waters 15:56, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

[edit]

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Michelle Vieth. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Additionally, do not add Spanish terms/words unless they are direct quotes. This is the English Wikipedia. --moreno oso (talk) 19:45, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Cuando Me Enamoro (Telenovela). There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. Thank you. --moreno oso (talk) 22:13, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2010

[edit]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Cuando Me Enamoro (Telenovela). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --moreno oso (talk) 13:41, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Maite Perroni, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --moreno oso (talk) 11:17, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Maite Perroni has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Happysailor (Talk) 19:34, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Maite Perroni has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Jebus989 21:12, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]