User talk:90dn8di

Welcome!

Hello, 90dn8di, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:90dn8di, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Johnj1995 (talk) 17:05, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:90dn8di

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:90dn8di requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Johnj1995 (talk) 17:05, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Menzies moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Elizabeth Menzies, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:23, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've had to move this article back into the draft space, because of referencing. Firstly, one of the sources cited appears to be a local file reference, which obviously cannot be used as it's not accessible to anyone (but you, presumably). Secondly, and more importantly, the other two sources are both close primary ones, and therefore unable to establish notability per [[WP:GNG]. We need to see significant coverage of the subject, in multiple independent and reliable secondary sources. (There is an exception to that, whereby some academics are considered inherently notable per WP:NPROF, but there is nothing in the article that suggests this standard would be me.) Please find more and better sources that satisfy the GNG criteria, and when you feel the article is ready for publication, you can ask for it to be reviewed, by clicking that blue 'submit' button. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:29, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elizabeth Alexandria Menzies has been accepted

Elizabeth Alexandria Menzies, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:21, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jane Dawson has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jane Dawson. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 22:56, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jane Dawson has been accepted

Jane Dawson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:05, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Elizabeth Menzies

Hello, 90dn8di. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Elizabeth Menzies, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Elizabeth Menzies

Hello, 90dn8di. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Elizabeth Menzies".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:26, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]