User talk:86.18.9.178

April 2017

Hello, I'm Jdcomix. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Emma Bunton have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jdcomix (talk) 22:55, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pizza Hut. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 14:27, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kerry Pentlow, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

SummerPhD^v2.0 19:28, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

March 2018

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to School of Rock, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:25, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

May 2018

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, String cheese, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 09:49, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Source?

Do you have a source for this edit? Thanks, JustBerry (talk) 20:05, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dairylea (cheese). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. •≈20+π^(u)•(t) 17:29, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Damon Albarn, you may be blocked from editing. The editor whose username is Z0 14:31, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

March 2019

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Taio Cruz; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 03:42, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

---