Jump to content

User talk:84.109.74.77

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Slavoj Zizek. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing.

September 2009[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

at Slavoj Žižek, per this complaint at WP:AN3. EdJohnston (talk) 19:44, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You returned from your block to continue to insert the same nonsense at Slavoj Žižek, a link to a video which is questionable under WP:BLP. (It makes claims about Žižek taking ideas from someone else and is confirmed by no reliable sources). You have been reblocked for 3 months. If you believe the block is unfair, or if you agree to stop this behavior, you may use {{unblock|Your reason here}} to request unblock. EdJohnston (talk) 14:33, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010[edit]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Pseudomonas(talk) 14:58, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

blocked[edit]

W
W

You have been blocked for a period of 1 year from editing Wikipedia for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia.

It is simple. Discuss and stop adding links that are removed over and over. 8 months of link additions only, 2 blocks (one of 3 months!), and still at it. See you later. --Dirk Beetstra T C 11:11, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]