User talk:7day

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Salam[edit]

Hello 7day! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing!--Sa.vakilian 19:01, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical

Anonymous User[edit]

Hello, I've seen that User:81.154.252.34 has been not listening to your requests to discuss the matter on the Islam in China page. He is also the same way in Major religious groups. What do you think can be done about him? Regards, -- Jeff3000 01:34, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Urdu translation[edit]

Hi, I'm trying to build up a database to create articles on political parties on different wikipedias. Could you have a look at User:Soman/Lang-Help-ur? Thanks, --Soman 14:36, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Liu He Quan[edit]

I have wikified your page to make it more presentable. Also, I have nominated the page to be merged with the Xingyi page. My reasons are given on the discussion page. I just thought you might like to know.

It seems to me that you should have named the article “Xinyi Liu He Quan” and instead of just “Liu He Quan”. I’m not an expert on Muslim martial arts, but from my understanding, Muslim Six Harmonies is a completely different boxing style than Muslim Xinyi Six Harmonies. (!Mi luchador nombre es amoladora de la carne y traigo el dolor! 22:16, 13 November 2006 (UTC))[reply]

True. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.227.51.252 (talk) 19:40, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template[edit]

Nice job on Template:Islam by country. BhaiSaab talk 02:41, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please give your comment[edit]

Can you please your vote at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Third_holiest_site_in_Islam_(expression) AFD. I wish if we could reach some consensus this time. Wassalam --- ALM 14:52, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: help wanted[edit]

You said: please help me with my articles on Muslims First Journey To America and Native Americans and Islam some islamaphobic people are destroying them7day 20:13, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I wish to email you. Can you enable your email please? --- ALM 16:16, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you aware of this? --Striver 00:25, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

btw, look at this:

http://www.muslimwikipedia.com/mw/index.php/Native_Americans_and_Islam

http://www.muslimwikipedia.com/mw/index.php/Muslims_First_Journey_To_America

--Striver 01:30, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


You claim that "Mahir Abdal-Razzaaq El a cherokee blackfoot and Muslim who writes for the Muslim Publication the Message."

However a true Muslim on http://muslimspace.com/blog/view/?ID=7326 dissects Mahir Abdal-Razzaaq El as a complete and utter fraud. In fact my misguided Muslim friend, Mr. "Mahir Abdal-Razzaaq El" is nothing more but a Black Hebrew Israelite associated with the site www.blackconciousness.com. 7day you were quick to jump to sources in spreading the lies of the Black Hebrew Israelite, Mr. "Mahir Abdal-Razzaaq El", but you have made yourself out to be the king of fools as the fleece has been pulled over your eyes. My advice to 7day please research your sources more carefully next time! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.247.22.37 (talk) 06:30, 12 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Also I've noticed that a lot of the article http://www.muslimwikipedia.com/mw/index.php/Native_Americans_and_Islam was spun off of the lies and misconceptions by the article written by Mr. "Mahir Abdal-Razzaaq El", a self described Black Hebrew Israelite of the website www.blackconciousness.com.

"It is only those who believe not in the Ayat (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) of Allaah, who fabricate falsehood, and it is they who are liars." (An-Nahl 16:105)


I can't see anything whatsoever on the http://www.muslimwikipedia.com/mw/index.php/Native_Americans_and_Islam page that references Mahir Abdal-Razzaaq El's article. Perhaps you need to check articles before you make spurious accusations talk 81.178.73.30 00:16, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


I apologize as I see that your English is not up to par, http://muslimspace.com/blog/view/?ID=7326 is an article written by a Muslim by the name of Hasan Grooms that dissects the fraud known as "Mahir Abdal-Razzaaq El". The treaty referenced as the "Treaty of Peace and Commerce Delaware [1] and the Act referenced as the Moors Sundry Act [2] were not treaties between American Muslims and America, they were between the American government and the government of Morrocco, however the kaffir "Mahir Abdal-Razzaaq El" claims that they were treaties between Americans and American Muslims. And there is also a link on the bottom of the article to "Mahir Abdal-Razzaaq El" claiming that Mahir is a Muslim, when in reality Mahir is a kaffir and self described "Black Hebrew Israelite" of the website www.blackconciousness.com. Even the name "Mahir Abdal-Razzaaq El" is a dead giveaway that "Mahir Abdal-Razzaaq El" is not a Muslim but a man who obtained his name through the Moorish Science Temple, a pseudo-cult based in Buddhism, Christianity, Freemasonry, Gnosticism and Taoism. Moorish_science_temple#The_church.27s_practices.

"It is only those who believe not in the Ayat (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) of Allaah, who fabricate falsehood, and it is they who are liars." (An-Nahl 16:105) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.244.187.43 (talk) 04:29, 13 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

If you knew just a little bit about Islam you would know that if someone says they are Muslim and does nothing to openly show Shirk then they are taken as a muslim. Regardless of what someone at MuslimSpace writes. If Mahir Abdal-razzal El states he is a muslim we take him as a Muslim 62.129.121.63 14:18, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


As salaam 'alaykum,

So a person claiming Islam can say that Allaah's name isn't Allaah but instead it is Yah, the Qur'an wasn't originally in Arabic but Hebrew, disparage Islam and the Muslims, claim the some from mankind namely the Cherokee and Jews weren't descended from Adam 'alayhis salam but came from a planet in the Sirius star system, is a "lord" in a jewish temple, admits himself that he is a black hebrew israelite (and those black hebrew israelites are occupying on behalf of the Zionist occupation government the Muslim Palestinian lands of Gaza and Dimona), is proven to be a liar and a complete and total fraud... and so many other things... and he is still considered a Muslim? La hawla wa la quwatta illa billaah. If you want shirk, then he calls upon Yah (a deity borrowed by the Israelites from the kuffaar of their time, just as they borrowed the golden calf) instead of Allaah, wa a'oothu billaah.

Brother or sister, when you spread falsehood, even if you do not mean to, you destroy the credibility of Islam and the Muslims and open us up to unneccessary attacks from our enemies. Do you want to be held accountable for that before Allaah?

Treaty of Peace and Commerce Delaware[edit]

Regarding the Treaty of Peace and Commerce Delaware, do you have a source that shows that as being the exact name of the treaty in question? The cited source does not mention the word "Delaware". --Metropolitan90 16:52, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see this. I had to revert (again) your addition of the template to the Islam in Turkey article. The template is so long that it messes up the format of the article and is very distracting to the reader. See the template's talk page and pls format it horizontally. Cheers! Baristarim 08:57, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Islam by country[edit]

Why did you remove this template from the list of assessment requests on the WikiProject Islam? Kkrystian 14:10 (UTC+1) 30 Dec 2006

my mistake i have corrected it.7day 07:58, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

السلام عليكم
i was wondering, you put up Template:Islam by country for review on the assessments page. did you mean the article Islam by country? templates don't really fall within the boundaries of article review, simply because there's not much to review. i could try to add whatever helpful comments i can about improving the template, if you'd prefer. ITAQALLAH 17:11, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 124.29.198.156 lifted or expired. Sorry for the trouble!

Request handled by: Luna Santin 06:52, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Pics[edit]

They were copyright violations, had improper tags, improper licenses, and no assertion of our ability to use them had been made. You may re-upload them with the all the correct information. I'm sure that Wikipedia:Images could help you. Cbrown1023 13:59, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


mosques[edit]

How about the template? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Striver (talk • contribs) 21:43, 15 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Your ridiculous charges[edit]

Before you make another ridiculous allegation, you should learn a thing or two about Wikipedia. Boxes are for the MAIN article. Palestinian refugees has an article and a box. By adding it again to another article, it would be WP:Undue weight. I have no idea if you are serious or if your English is not the best, but it is purely false that I have "deleted vital info." I have not deleted anything to either of the articles you mentioned. I removed a box that was unneeded to the article, re-ordered the countries listed as per the United Nations source, and have only been adding to the Arab citizens of Israel. --Shamir1 23:04, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Image:110070264 7c84f153fb.jpg[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:110070264 7c84f153fb.jpg, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.flickr.com/photos/frogdeck/110070264/in/set-72057594078463273/. As a copyright violation, Image:110070264 7c84f153fb.jpg appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:110070264 7c84f153fb.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on [[Talk::Image:110070264 7c84f153fb.jpg]]. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Image:110070264 7c84f153fb.jpg, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. feydey 08:52, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr images[edit]

See: Additional Information © All rights reserved. "This photo is public" means everyone can view it, there is no such copyright term. Whereas Flickr images licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 (cc-by-2.0), like this: "Additional Information Attribution Some rights reserved." are usable on Wikipedia. They are tagged with {{Flickrsource}}, when uploaded here. See Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags/Displayed_and_ranked for CC images uploadable to Wikipedia. Best, feydey 09:15, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seems good :-P. Cbrown1023 22:36, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Islam in China[edit]

yo homeslice just to let you know I removed Wuer Kaixi, Tohti Tunyaz and Huseyincan Celil from your list of Chinese Muslims, they are NOT Chinese, they are UYGHUR! So please stop spreading your stupid communist propaganda saying they are Chinese, get that s#!t straight, alright? I'm tired of this communist bulls#!t! if you dont know the difference, I suggest on some links and learn already! later paki. UyghurKid023

Chinese mosques[edit]

Hey, sorry not to respond to you sooner on this. The pictures look good! I don't have many good reference books with me right now since I'm travelling overseas; once I'm back to Hong Kong, I'm sure I can expand it a lot based on some books I can borrow from the library there, like "History of Architecture in Xinjiang", "Islamic Architecture in China" [3], etc. This essay is also a decent overview of the subject. cab 10:52, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Chinese Muslims studying overseas[edit]

An editor has nominated Chinese Muslims studying overseas, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinese Muslims studying overseas and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 09:46, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

warning[edit]

You keep reposting the same copyright material about islam in China under different names. This amounts to vandalism and will soon lead to a block. jimfbleak 09:40, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

refernecing an article does not mean that there is no copyright infringement. You can copy any piece of text and put a reference on, but that does not make it public domain. Anyway, the point of the above is that if you wish to challenge the deletion, you should do so, not just recreate with a different article name. jimfbleak 20:25, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr images again[edit]

Hello, when you upload images from Flickr, please make sure they are actually licensed appropriately for Wikipedia first! The original photo page at Flickr must state that the image is licensed under CC-BY 2.0 or CC-BY-SA 2.0 only! Any other tag such as "All rights reserved" or a CC license including "NC" (noncommercial use only) or "ND" (no derivatives) is not allowed at Wikipedia. Please be more careful; I just had to delete a whole lot of images you uploaded as being copyright violations. Thanks! —Angr 22:08, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

7day (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i have not indulged in vandalisam of any sort my only motive was to expand the islam in china page and the subsequent pages.And by the way the article Islamic education in China was not created by me. hope you will consider this

Decline reason:

Sorry, but you were warned multiple times about adding copyrighted material to Wikipedia. The blocking admin already shortened your block significantly; it will only last for a few days. In the meantime, familiarizing yourself with Wikipedia:Copyrights and Wikipedia:Copyright violations will likely allow you to contribute more constructively when your block ends. -- Natalya 04:16, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

MY FIRST BLOCK FOR SPREADING THE TRUTH ABOUT ISLAM7day 06:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Look buddy please don't play the religion card for sympathy because it isn't working! Don't you dare to pretend you were unjustly targeted because you were Muslim! Wikipedia's administrators catch plenty of people everyday for posting up copyright violations, it has NOTHING to do with religion, so please don't you dare to spin this into some conspiracy theory of how the administrators are out to get you due to your religious background. Look you were caught redhanded posting articles using COPYRIGHTED information, in fact buddy you were just blindly copying and pasting information from other sources without any regard to the copyright information. Just because you find something out there doesn't mean you can cut and paste it, not everything is PUBLIC DOMAIN buddy! Please learn the definition of the term "copyright"!

I did you the favor of listing what your copyright violations were.

these were pictures you lifted off of someone's photo album without their permission and also the original photos were not licensed under CC-BY 2.0 or CC-BY-SA 2.0 only.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:248982468_edc2d42af6.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:248999323_81aa33003e.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:110070264_7c84f153fb.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:112474163_99c78a9415.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:114167291_4fae22d0b9.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:110137225_e4e5f0ba70.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:114167290_6f6034aca.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:114178174_7cc8c48114.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:110070263_e2db0a7749.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:114167289_2e31a3bb0f.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:248193322_522e5c6e94.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:248193325_36ffa9682b.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:248210388_84e0019b0f.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:248210388_84e009b0f.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:252805313_ebd3a594e6.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:252826300_4a417cc7c6.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:294471346_a7fa7da171.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:313360265_05bccca146.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:277204194_fa42a0f1cd.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:277101672_58e0384fbc.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:257700656_22504ea885.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:295292740_0fb8aa9ab6.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:294448627_99aace75eb.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:252276924_727935b978.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:192734826_715205b747.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:192737723_c0d649c822.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:364412107_2ca04763f6.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:212038520_ca4d5f0d7f.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:51777382_d721a974e5.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:299956692_1e670acf52.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:49050862_130e52a16d.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:11801218_e80fe845d2.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:56099370_8c93a2c2c9.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:201604250_6e6db3aaa8.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:36077882_5b718c6fbe.jpg

as for the articles you claimed you did not create:

That's 5, count it, 5 articles that you created through lifting it off of the url: http://www.asiaquarterly.com/content/view/166/41/ so don't play ignorant and say the articles weren't created by you.

also of note, another one of your articles that you created, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=China_Islamic_Association which was ripped off of the url: http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/islam/history/china_4.shtml .

Bottom line you were caught with copyright infringement, so please don't make this out to be anything else besides that. In the meantime, please familarize yourself with Wikipedia:Copyrights and Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Sinf3d3Liiou5

As for the pics i have no objection to that. and of note to you about http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=China_Islamic_Association please see this [[4]] this was not created by me but it was coppied by me for the new article of China Islamic Association .7day 08:55, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


And as for talking about the main page of Islamic education in China .The subsequent pages

were created out of it by me but not the main page.i think that you should talk to the guy that created that page. And I did you the favor of showing who created that page[[5]] 7day 08:34, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MY FIRST BLOCK FOR SPREADING THE TRUTH ABOUT ISLAM7day 21:16, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, buddy YOUR FIRST BLOCK FOR BEING CAUGHT WITH COPYRIGHT VIOLATIONS even aside from your 5 pages that you copied from url: http://www.asiaquarterly.com/content/view/166/41/ , you brought up that someone else had copied the main page to begin with, but still does not excuse for copying 5 articles using the same copyrighted source as the original user.

You also had http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=China_Islamic_Association was ripped off of the url: http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/islam/history/china_4.shtml and 30+ images which were flagged as copyright violations. You were caught with COPYRIGHT VIOLATIONS, bottom line so please sir do not try to spin this situation into something that it is not.

Next time please be more careful with your sources instead of blindly cutting and pasting, thank you and have a nice day. Sinf3d3Liiou5

aye lad you missed out on some more violations http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=Chamir, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=Wu_Zhong, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=Wang_zi_ping,

cheers —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ghostridingwhips (talk • contribs) 07:59, 23 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

salam[edit]

sorry to see that you were blocked . and judging from the discussion i will say that some people will deny the truth no matter how many proofs are given to them.Madman 0014 13:12, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ya i can see!!!!!!!!!.7day 07:57, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Druze in Israel[edit]

Hi. All recognized religions in Israel (which includes every sizable community) have their own court systems. The Druze are recognized as separate. [6] --Shamir1 23:25, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Citations[edit]

The Muslim Chinese martial arts needs a major overhaul. A large portion of it is missing in-line citations. The few sections that do have them only cover a sentence or two and not all of the material. Hell, even though the Xingyi section was historically incorrect, it was presented as fact. It was terrible before I made this edit. In fact, the entire page is full of uncited POV statements and incorrect material. All of this needs to be corrected.

I'm glad that you are keeping an eye on the page, but there is no reason to delete any {{Fact}} tags placed by other users. Plus, all of the dead links (those colored 'red' without a page) make the article ugly. They need to be de-linked until a page is written for them. (Ghostexorcist 06:36, 22 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]


although Huo Diange, Li Chenwu, and Liu Yunqiao were students of Li Shuwen, where is the information saying they were also Muslims? From all I can see is that they were disciples of a teacher who was Muslim, that doesnt makes the students Muslim now does it? For example a teacher who is Christian could be teaching a class full of students, but the students aren't necessary Christian simply because the teacher is, you see my point. deleting this non neutral POV. Also what is the point in reverting the name "Li Shuwen" to "Li Shu Wen" and "Li Chenwu" to "Li Chen Wu" and "Liu Yunqiao" to "Liu Yun Qiao" please stop reverting it, it is extremely annoying! learn how Chinese names are spelled first of all before you insist on reverting them! it's bloodying annoying to see your ignorance on Chinese names and to see you revert them when you clearly dont even know how the Chinese names are spelled out.

it is NOT "De Zhou", it is Dezhou, why are you repeatedly reverting this? why are you so insistant that is spelled otherwise?

why are you reverting the wiki links of Sun Yat-sen, Chiang Kai-shek and Mao Zedong to Sun Yat Sen, Chiang Kai Shek and Mao Tsedong? what is the point of this? why are you bloody doing this? vandalism perhaps? that is how they are spelled, stop insisting they are spelled otherwise!

another thing where is Tong Xian County in Hebei? There is no Tong Xian County in the province of Hebei! why are you insisting that this county exists? where is your evidence that this county exists? if you cant prove that there is a Tong Xian County in Hebei, why the hell are adding this back into the article? what's going on here man?

by the way why are you deleting delete any {{Fact}} tags? stop it! if the section was tagged it means that the section is lacking references, so why you are insisting on removing these tags without providing solid references in the first place?

please refrain from this type of vandalism it is bloody childish and reflects poorly on you.

where are your sources that the Islamic Association of China is called the Chinese Patriotic Islamic Association? if you dont have any sources why the hell are you repeatedly reverting this? fine lets bury the bloody hachet already, find a source in Chinese calling it the Chinese Patriotic Islamic Association, I do believe you will be hard pressed seeing it is officially known as the Islamic Association of China. I swear such childish and immature vandalism on your part sir.

outrageous behavior on your part sir, I'd say. http://english.people.com.cn/whitepaper/18.html here, it is not called the "Islamic Association of China"? yet you childishly insist there is no such thing as the Islamic Association of China and insist on it being called "Chinese Patriotic Islamic Association". here is the Chinese transliteration "中国伊斯兰教协会" if you bloody insist that is the "Chinese Patriotic Islamic Association" translate it for me then! why do you keep on insisting that it is called that when you know you are wrong?


Ottoman language Wikipedia[edit]

Hello 7day


I am a history teacher from Istanbul, Turkey. We need your vote [7] for opening Ottoman language wikipedia

--Tarih 22:31, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mosque[edit]

Please read over Wikipedia:Image use policy#Displayed image size and Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Images. From the first link "In articles, if you wish to have a photo beside the text, you should generally use the "thumbnail" option available in the "Image markup" (this results in 180 pixels wide display in standard preferences default setting)." From the second link "If there are too many images in a given article, consider using a gallery.", "Specifying the size of a thumb image is not recommended: without specifying a size the width will be what the reader has specified in their user preferences, with a default of 180px (which applies for most readers)." and "Bear in mind that some users need to configure their systems to display large text. Forced large thumbnails can leave little width for text, making reading difficult." On top of making it difficult for people to read it also makes the page slow to load. Reducing images and adding galleries is standard and something I do to articles as I find them. Please try and follow policy. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 11:06, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ismaili template[edit]

I prefer the older layout bro. Thanks for your contributions, though! --Enzuru 03:56, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

wp pakistan[edit]

help wanted with wp pakistan.thanks203.81.217.20

Possibly unfree Image:114167290 6f6034acaa.jpg[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:114167290 6f6034acaa.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Madmedea 21:04, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • This image currently includes a link to flickr as its source - the flickr image is tagged as "all rights reserved" and therefore is not in the public domain. If you are the creator of the image please state that on the image summary and change the license tag to {{PD-self}}. You may also want to leave a message to that effect on the discussion page linked above. Madmedea 21:04, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Karachi_riots_1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Karachi_riots_1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:20, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Islam in North America[edit]

A tag has been placed on Islam in North America, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kathy A. 17:03, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Islam in India[edit]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. deeptrivia (talk) 00:41, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you should keep you pov out of wikipedia.7day 10:36, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Explain now why are you inflating the population figures of Muslims in India without even changing the reference? You changed the percentage of Muslims in India from 13.4%, which is the proper figure from the 2001 census, to 16.4% without citing a new source. It is dead obvious that you just wanted to inflate the figure by a few integers. This is made even more clear by the fact that in table under the section population statistics, the figures for the years 1961 through 1991 are accurate, while the figure for 2001 magically gets inflated to 14.4% from 12.4% for adjusted figures and 16.4% from 13.4% for unadjusted figures. Furthermore, even the math is incorrect. 16.4% puts the number of Muslims in India at 168.6 million, not 174 million.12.214.172.85 03:41, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

please do not add your biase to this article.7day 06:53, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Nansitou.jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Nansitou.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) (random) 18:02, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Xunhua mosque china.jpg as well. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 18:55, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:MQM rally on 15 april.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:MQM rally on 15 april.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:13, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan Scouting[edit]

Can you help render Almustaid (Be Prepared), the Scout Motto, into Urdu script? Thanks! Chris 06:24, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:YiningHuizu2.jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:YiningHuizu2.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 14:02, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:IMG 0032.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:IMG 0032.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:48, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eid Mubarak[edit]

Eid Mubarak!

Wishing you and your family a blessed Eid.

Your friendly neighborhood Muslim.

If you object to the above message, please remove it, accept my apologies and notify me on my talk page.

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Songjiang shanghai china.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Songjiang shanghai china.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:24, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dachangqingzhensi.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Dachangqingzhensi.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:01, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Earlytomb.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Earlytomb.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:16, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Buzhen mosque china.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Buzhen mosque china.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:55, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Najiahu mosque china.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Najiahu mosque china.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:56, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Islam in the Solomon Islands[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Islam in the Solomon Islands, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. Docg 21:19, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:HistoryOfIslamInAmerica[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:HistoryOfIslamInAmerica requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 06:53, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

China Islamic Association[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of China Islamic Association, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/islam/history/china_4.shtml. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:29, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted RFA[edit]

I've deleted Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/7day as housekeeping since it was never transcluded to the RFA page and would best be re-created when you intend to run for Adminship. MBisanz talk 20:14, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please Comment[edit]

Wikipedia:Images_and_media_for_deletion/2008_November_29#Image:Jyllands-Posten-pg3-article-in-Sept-30-2005-edition-of-KulturWeekend-entitled-Muhammeds-ansigt.png akhwandk (talk) 13:00, 2 December 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Proposed deletion of Islam in Monaco[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Islam in Monaco, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable subject with only trivial information available. Seems to exist for the sole purpose of having an article for every country in Islam by country.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jafeluv (talk) 08:26, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Islam in Christmas Island[edit]

I have nominated Islam in Christmas Island, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islam in Christmas Island. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. HJMitchell You rang? 22:04, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello 7day! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 940 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Ma Xianda - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 02:29, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ma Xianda for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Ma Xianda, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ma Xianda until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The WordsmithCommunicate 20:09, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ma Xianda for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Ma Xianda, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ma Xianda until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The WordsmithCommunicate 20:11, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:MQM rally on 15 april.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:MQM rally on 15 april.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 10:38, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Join us at FB[edit]

Hello Pakistanis Wikipedians! Assalam-o-Alaikum, I hope you are enjoying editing Wikipedia and helping around. I want to join every Pakistani Wikipedian on facebook so I hope you would like to join us in our community. We would/could help each other and make Pakistani articles more better.

Join us:

And then sign my guestbook for memories.

Regards: -- Captain Wikipedia! ( T - C - G ) 13:09, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library![edit]

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!
Hi 7day! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! 14:16, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Muslim Chinese Martial Arts[edit]

Template:Muslim Chinese Martial Arts has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 17:32, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Islam in Bhutan for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Islam in Bhutan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islam in Bhutan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TryKid [dubious – discuss] 05:27, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:7day&oldid=1088386901"