User talk:79.95.91.51

December 2019

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Aziz Mohammad Bhai, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. that's sourced. if you wish to add that he was proven not guilty. then add in sourced content saying such, but do not remove sourced content. LakesideMiners^{Come Talk To Me!} 13:53, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Aziz Mohammad Bhai, you may be blocked from editing. That addition is not sourced LakesideMiners^{Come Talk To Me!} 13:54, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Aziz Mohammad Bhai. XXX8906 (talk) 13:55, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Aziz Mohammad Bhai. LakesideMiners^{Come Talk To Me!} 13:56, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:24, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

79.95.91.51 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear Sir/Madam, I have several times tried to edit the context of the page featuring information on this living person which is massively one sided. For example, just today, I have tried several times to add context that the murder allegations referred to were thrown out for lack of evidence. These issues are long running for Mr. Bhai who has faced much blackmail in Bangladesh both from persons accusing him of things or, because he refused to be party to corruption. The issues are so complex and distressing as well as time consuming, rather than editing the page, Mr. Bhai agreed that I request a deletion. This was denied and I was blocked. I have now attempted to reedit the sections by simply adding the line: "The case was never brought forward as no evidence connected Bhai to the crime," and though none of the news sources cited refute that, the edit keeps being reverted. Either please allow the feature of balanced information or, take the page down. Kind wishes

Decline reason:

Thanks for letting us know you have a conflict of interest. Once the block expires, you are required to declare your conflict of interest according to WP:COI and should refrain from any direct edits to the page. As noted below, you need a source for your edits; WP:CITE and WP:RS explain what's required. Again, though, please refrain from any direct edits. Note also that we don't care what Mr. Bhai wants, only what reliable sources say. Yamla (talk) 14:45, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non admin observation) please note that you need to provide sources for your edits. Otherwise, your edits will be reverted again. XXX8906 (talk) 14:41, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

@XXX8906: That is not reasonable for edits like this. The sources given to link Aziz Mohammad Bhai with someone's death are very flimsy. Yes, they do say that the link was made, but there is no hint of there being any evidence, nor did the three sources I looked at have any hint of a follow-up. Editors wanting to have half a WP:BLP article focus on murder allegations need to have better sources. What sources have you seen that justify the state of the article? Johnuniq (talk) 06:39, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

---