User talk:76.92.165.89

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


October 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I edit Wikipedia too, under the username Velella. I noticed that you recently made an edit that seemed to be a test. Congratulations, your test worked! If you would like to experiment further, you are welcome to use the sandbox. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me on my talk page. Wikipedia is written by people like you and me, and we care a lot about the quality of the encyclopedia. Please help us make it better! Thanks,  Velella  Velella Talk   22:30, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2012 in American television. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TomCat4680 (talk) 00:09, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2012 in American television, you may be blocked from editing. TomCat4680 (talk) 00:09, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2012 in American television, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TomCat4680 (talk) 00:10, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning (10-28-2011)[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Farine (talk) 01:18, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

10-30-2011[edit]

{{unblock-ip reviewed|1=76.92.165.89|2=<nowiki>[[WP:Block#Evasion of blocks|Block evasion]]: See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/William313]]|3=HelloAnnyong}} </nowiki>

  • Block not reviewed as this IP is directly blocked, not autoblocked. The logged reason is block evasion. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:29, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

11-03-2011[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

76.92.165.89 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

76.92.165.89

Decline reason:

No reason given to unblockJac16888 Talk 00:18, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

November 2011[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Katie (talk show), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Digifan23 (talk) 20:43, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2011[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Farine (talk) 02:04, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at 2012 in American television, you may be blocked from editing. TomCat4680 (talk) 23:51, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

76.92.165.89 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

76.92.165.89

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 23:57, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

September 2012[edit]

As this IP continues to be used to evade the block of User:William313 it has been re-blocked for a year. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 20:24, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:76.92.165.89&oldid=1139883775"