User talk:75.82.55.0

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Talk:Mossad, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 21:36, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
excuse me??? 75.82.55.0 (talk) 03:15, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Mossad, you may be blocked from editing. If you have proper sources, list them. Talk pages are not there so you can send Wikipedia editors on wild goose chases to prove conspiracy theories. NeilN talk to me 14:10, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
How exactly are my edits disruptive?
As I wrote above: If you have proper sources, list them. Talk pages are not there so you can send Wikipedia editors on wild goose chases to prove conspiracy theories.--NeilN talk to me 20:44, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Uh no actually, my contribution is actually appropriate and 100% on topic. I read the rules. I'm not sending anyone on anything. Are you removing my posts simply because you feel like it? My post actually complies with wikipedia policy - 100%. At this point I feel you are removing my post simply because you feel like it. I don't think you are allowed to remove something simply because you don't like it. Please really stop and think why this is inappropriate.
Yeah I don't have to list anything. Sorry but I feel as if you are giving me some kind of order, which again, is not really in your place to do. Please do not revert edits which comply with wikipedia policy. That is actually absurd.
If you don't provide sources then I will simply assume you are trolling which will result in a block. --NeilN talk to me 20:59, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
ok? Why do you feel that i need to provide a source though? You have really failed to explain this. Again, I am in 100% compliance with policy. I'm just going to ignore you if you do not actually give reason to your actions. You do seem to have some kind of agenda, no offense, but at this point I feel that you are just wasting my time. 75.82.55.0 (talk) 21:04, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Because posts like, "Hey, I heard the government puts fluoride in the water so they can control your brain. I don't have sources, go find them." are disruptive. See WP:DISRUPTSIGNS: "...fails to cite sources, cites unencyclopedic sources, misrepresents reliable sources, or manufactures original research." --NeilN talk to me 21:18, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN talk to me 21:19, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
  • That is almost completely out of context to what I actually wrote though. Did you read what I actually wrote? You really shouldn't be grooming talk pages to your personal liking. Thanks. 75.82.55.0 (talk) 03:24, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

75.82.55.0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Absolute compliance with all rules, no reason to ban. 75.82.55.0 (talk) 03:29, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This sort of thing just fills me with confidence that you're here to contribute productively... Yunshui 雲水 08:07, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your refusal to list sources, including "one source in particular is quite viable", strongly suggests you're only here to troll. I suggest open forums like reddit may more to your liking. --NeilN talk to me 04:41, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you know what trolling really is. It hasn't even begun. 75.82.55.0 (talk) 06:11, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ITS TOO LATE

absolutely happening
we wuzzzzzzzz
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:75.82.55.0&oldid=823445514"