Jump to content

User talk:72.214.255.89

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so on Wikipedia:Sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Tan | 39 21:57, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Talk:Justin Bieber. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. December21st2012Freak chat 21:59, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Beatrix Potter, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Slp1 (talk) 21:39, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Slp1 (talk) 21:44, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Alexander Calder.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:47, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 3 days from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Mentifisto 21:49, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Oscar Munoz, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Oscar Munoz was changed by 72.214.255.89 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-10-26T16:16:06+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:16, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Beatrix Potter, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Beatrix Potter was changed by 72.214.255.89 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-11-03T22:53:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:53, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009[edit]

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Juan Rodríguez Cabrillo worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Gerardw (talk) 19:09, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Jamestown, Virginia has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. JovianEye (talk) 22:05, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Mayflower. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 22:13, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Mayflower. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 22:18, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Mayflower. RazielZero (talk) 22:21, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 22:22, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Rafael Trujillo has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Uncle Dick (talk) 16:33, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Rafael Trujillo. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. C628 (talk) 16:34, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Rafael Trujillo. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 16:36, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Rafael Trujillo. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 16:37, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


You have been blocked from editing for 1 month in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy as a result of your repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} . Kuru (talk) 16:45, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


April 2010[edit]

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Quebec Act worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Road Wizard (talk) 22:01, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2010[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at King Kong. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AtticusX (talk) 21:55, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Jaime Escalante has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Shadowjams (talk) 20:35, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to William Howe, 5th Viscount Howe, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

January 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Music download, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Music download was changed by 72.214.255.89 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.966514 on 2011-01-31T21:24:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:24, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Parodies of Harry Potter. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Music download, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Music download was changed by 72.214.255.89 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.888372 on 2011-02-02T17:35:05+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:35, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Inca architecture, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Inca architecture was changed by 72.214.255.89 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.974089 on 2011-02-23T16:41:07+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:41, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Inca architecture. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you! -- RahulText me 17:09, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Inca architecture. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Wikipelli Talk 18:54, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hermes, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Hermes was changed by 72.214.255.89 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956209 on 2011-02-28T19:39:58+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:40, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hermes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TBloemink (talk) 19:41, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Bloons TD. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Epbr123 (talk) 22:42, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bloons TD, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Bloons TD was changed by 72.214.255.89 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.856077 on 2011-02-28T22:43:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:43, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Bloons TD. Epbr123 (talk) 22:44, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Mayflower, you will be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Mayflower was changed by 72.214.255.89 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.852925 on 2011-02-28T22:47:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:47, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. Favonian (talk) 22:31, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments: Blocked for 3 months.

September 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Edwin Valero, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Edwin Valero was changed by 72.214.255.89 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960195 on 2011-09-15T17:50:11+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:50, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Edwin Valero with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Hallows AG(talk) 17:52, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Luis Estaba, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Luis Estaba was changed by 72.214.255.89 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96329 on 2011-09-19T17:54:46+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:54, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Simón Bolívar with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:04, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to History of Israel, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: History of Israel was changed by 72.214.255.89 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.937452 on 2011-10-14T18:02:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:03, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at History of Israel with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 18:06, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to History of Israel with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. DVdm (talk) 18:11, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dougweller (talk) 20:32, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to James Clerk Maxwell, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: James Clerk Maxwell was changed by 72.214.255.89 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959011 on 2012-05-01T16:07:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:07, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at James Clerk Maxwell. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. trunks_ishida (talk) 16:18, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Mephistophelian. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Climate of Costa Rica, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Mephistophelian (talk) 18:59, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mayflower, you may be blocked from editing. Pinethicket (talk) 15:43, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

November 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Sons of Liberty, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 16:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Annie Oakley. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Annie Oakley was changed by 72.214.255.89 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2012-11-29T19:02:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:02, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

February 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Milly Quezada. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Milly Quezada was changed by 72.214.255.89 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.983284 on 2013-02-28T17:34:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:34, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Humahuaca, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Widr (talk) 22:02, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Black Bart (outlaw) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

April 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Op art has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

November 2017[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Acebulf. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Julieta Venegas— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Acebulf (talk) 21:31, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Happy Days Are Here Again. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Petrb (talk) 17:20, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to James W. Marshall have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 20:33, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at James W. Marshall. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 20:34, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2019[edit]

Information icon Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Pop music. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. (yes, I'm afraid we really do have no sense of humour in the articles) Nosebagbear (talk) 22:00, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm TheEpTic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to John Leguizamo—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. TheEpTic (talk) 22:29, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Strait of Gibraltar. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 17:16, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Strait of Gibraltar, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Strait of Gibraltar was changed by 72.214.255.89 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959319 on 2019-12-12T19:22:27+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:22, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]