Jump to content

User talk:71.80.226.121

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. DakPowers (Talk) 02:20, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring on Wall Street Journal[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 23:35, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Welcome! Do set up an account: as a single article IP editor you will always attract attention if the editing is at all contentious as your edits on WSJ appear to have been. Also, have a look at WP:BRD, which suggests a way forward rather than repeatedly adding the same material. Springnuts (talk) 18:56, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]