User talk:71.212.13.9

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made on Jenny Durkan. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (71.212.13.9) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page.

Again, welcome! GorillaWarfare (talk) 15:18, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Citations[edit]

Thanks for expanding Richard Hedreen. Please note that citations that aren't using a URL do not require the accessdate parameter to be filled. SounderBruce 05:11, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Balon Greyjoy. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Richard Hedreen, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 07:54, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Hello, I'm WikiMacaroons. I noticed that you recently removed content from Richard Hedreen without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. WikiMacaroons (talk) 10:18, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2020[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 03:02, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
It was not at all disruptive, I was reverting your disruptive edit. And now you're attempting to troll my edit history by deleting content from other pages that this IP has edited. Please stop being disruptive.--71.212.13.9 (talk) 03:06, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
So Drmies seems dead set on blocking this IP. I only ask that a more reasonable admin looks into this. The deleted content was removed for no reason other than WP:IDONTLIKEIT, and Drmies still refuses to explain why it should be removed. I would like to point out that the content is in regards to racist remarks that the mayor of Seattle said, although she said it was accidental, as well as a high profile court case in which the mayors arguments were to slander and blame the underage victims of a sexual misconduct case. I was both dubious and saddened by Drmies motives here. But do as you will.--71.212.13.9 (talk) 03:20, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And I am going to revert you again. I don't think I need to point you to the BLP, and I think that it's also clear that in many of your edits (like on that Hilton hotel building billionaire) you seem to have it in for that mayor. Drmies (talk) 03:23, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Or perhaps I think its noteworthy when a major politician from a large US city has a history of blaming victims of sexual molestation. Perhaps for personal reasons. Do as you like though.--71.212.13.9 (talk) 03:39, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add defamatory content, as you did at Jenny Durkan. Drmies (talk) 03:24, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

When you say "[she] has a history of blaming victims of sexual molestation," this is far cry from the actual circumstances in which she was a private attorney who was employed to represent a client. And saying "perhaps for personal reasons" is almost clear evidence that you have some sort of deluded bias against this individual. This isn't a hate Durkan hate page. Stop your childish behavior.Rwnix404 (talk) 05:53, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Everything in the article is written in an encyclopedic tone. WP:IDONTLIKEIT is not encyclopedic. Hurry up please.--71.212.13.9 (talk) 06:13, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Jenny Durkan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sjö (talk) 06:28, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Yep.--71.212.13.9 (talk) 07:04, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please continue discussion on Jenny Durkan talk page Rwnix404 (talk) 08:52, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Jenny Durkan) for a period of 36 hours for edit warring.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:14, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits, specifically one that you made on Jenny Durkan ‎, may have introduced material that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When adding material that may be controversial, it is good practice to first discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them, to gain consensus over whether or not to include the text, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. Thank you. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:15, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.