User talk:71.185.227.61

May 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Herod the Great. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 02:46, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Excuse me, but your false statement "although most Herod biographers do not believe that this event occurred" constitutes vandalism. Firstly, it is false, and you provide a mere one citation which thus constitutes your opinion. The murdering of the innocents has been a universally accepted truth. By suggesting otherwise, you provide a gross bias and an uneducated viewpoint. You need to read more. If you continue in sharing your bias and ignorance, you will be blocked. 71.185.227.61 (talk) 03:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

has been a universally accepted truth—nope, it was only believed by Christians, and probably most Christians would have agreed with it before the Enlightenment. Liberal Christianity generally sides with mainstream history vs. traditional beliefs. I.e. it has no problem accepting that the event wasn't real. tgeorgescu (talk) 03:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Herod the Great. tgeorgescu (talk) 02:50, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

• Before making sweeping changes to the date formats used in the article, you need to get consensus at the talk page. See WP:ENGVAR for more about keeping with established patterns like this in articles. —C.Fred (talk) 03:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —C.Fred (talk) 03:30, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Fred, please grow up. From my and other's viewpoints, you're the disruptor. The designations BCE and CE still require Jesus' birth as the focal point. You can't escape reality. Read the following - "Edit warring over how exactly to present encyclopedic content is not vandalism. Careful consideration may be required to differentiate between edits that are beneficial, edits that are detrimental but well-intentioned, and edits that are vandalism. If it is clear that an editor is intending to improve Wikipedia, their edits are not vandalism, even if they violate some core policy of Wikipedia. Mislabeling good faith edits "vandalism" can be harmful, as it makes users less likely to respond to corrective advice or to engage collaboratively during a disagreement. For that reason, avoid using the term "vandalism" unless it is clear the user means to harm Wikipedia." 71.185.227.61 (talk) 03:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

You do not make the WP:RULES. You did not comply with our WP:RULES, so you got blocked. Maybe is better that you edit Conservapedia instead of Wikipedia. tgeorgescu (talk) 03:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

I didn't say you were vandalizing. I said you were disrupting the project, particularly with the change of date formats. I'll also now point out that you've engaged in a personal attack. —C.Fred (talk) 03:46, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

---