Jump to content

User talk:64.92.23.243

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 2023

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Typhoon Haiyan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 19:47, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Typhoon Haiyan. Favonian (talk) 19:49, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1]This is a reliable source (wuderground) 64.92.23.243 (talk) 19:54, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
and also why did you revert all my edits 64.92.23.243 (talk) 20:12, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello! Earlier, I saw an edit you made to the 1974 Xenia tornado and I wanted to know where you saw the information. In your edit, you changed the wind speed from the 250-305 to 265-320. At the bottom of the infobox, there is a source for the 250-305, so I was curious where you found the 265-320? Cheers and thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 20:47, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As ted fujita initially rated it as an f6 +- 1 that would mean winds speeds of around 320 mph but it was downgraded to f5 so about 265 mph wind so 265-320 mph 64.92.23.243 (talk) 23:10, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ah ok. Well in this paper from Dr. Fujita, he estimated the wind speeds to be between 250 to 305 mph. So the infobox wind speeds in this instance should reflect that I think. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 23:24, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So it maybe could have been an f4 as well. But it could also be one of the fastest tornadoes because it could have had wind speeds of up to 305 mph which is higher than Bridge creek moore '99. 64.92.23.243 (talk) 16:18, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
and also could you please edit the el reno article because the winds in that article are only 155 mph 64.92.23.243 (talk) 16:32, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]