Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has now been reverted or removed. Please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for any other tests you want to do, since testing in articles will be reverted quickly. Please see the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- Please note that this refers to edits on the article Put-in-Bay, Ohio. Silas Snider (talk) 00:03, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Silas Snider (talk) 00:08, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
Hi,I see you're placing some links in the Put-in-Bay,_Ohio article to commercial web pages that deal in advertising to visitors. Unfortunately, Wikipedia doesn't allow commercial links like this. [1] Persistently linking to one's own site is considered Vandalism and can result in sanctions. [2]
Your stance of either being an original contributor to the article or restoring the article to the writer's original content is not valid. At the bottom of every edit box, there is the following sentence: "If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, do not submit it." Please see ownership of articles.
On a personal note, someone looking for places to stay in Put-in-Bay will not research Wikipedia for that information. Wikipedia is not known for its great links to commercial sites. More likely, people turn to Wikipedia when they need demographic and historical information on a place. I think your time could be better spent promoting these sites elsewhere.
Per WP:NOT, Wikipedia is not a democracy, and your rights are not protected by the 1st amendment. I suggest you review your property laws, as Wikipedia is a privately owned entity. Furthermore, adding nonsense to Wikipedia will result in it being deleted, and possibly in a block being placed on this IP adress so that you can no longer edit. Please modify your behaviour accordingly. --Scimitar 9 July 2005 18:46 (UTC)
I'm not following, is this some kind of a greeting letter you send to noobies? is there a reson it looks so disorganized?
Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Hall Monitor 18:56, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please do any testing here. Nufy8 16:12, 12 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Func( t, c, @,) 22:49, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Owen×☎ 01:22, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Ip's are not allowed to control their talk pages, if you want to control your own (i.e. blank out comments) please register a user name. Please don't get upset with me because I personally disagree with this policy. Molotov ~ e ~ (talk)File:Devilsmiley.jpg 02:17, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jobe6 05:48, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Please leave talk pages as they are, and please do not add obscenities to them. -- Francs2000 00:43, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --R.Koot 21:09, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This IP has been blocked for 15 minutes for your repeated disruption to the reference desk. As for your question, Venus looks sort of cream yellow, and its year is about 243 225 days. --HappyCamper 21:18, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I found more material to help you out on the reference desk. Check it out when you get a chance! --HappyCamper 22:32, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
RE: [3][4][5] Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. Thank you. Hall Monitor 22:41, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Docask? 23:58, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
! Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. FireFox 12:56, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please explain the dozens of edits you're making on Thomas and Friends - Season 2? If you're going to make so many edits, do it all as one edit, please, instead of dozens of them.--Metros232 21:51, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thanks again. --Metros232 22:39, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This message is regarding the page Thomas and Friends - Season 2. Please stop removing content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Alfmelmac 22:40, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Alfmelmac 22:41, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sceptre(Talk) 20:55, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding the page Bob Kasunic, please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (ESkog)(Talk) 20:21, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --NaconKantarie|t||c|m 02:11, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. RexNL 16:58, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sango123(e) 17:41, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MoP 23:22, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Naconkantarie|t||c|m 03:58, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Noah's Ark. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. TigerShark 00:26, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I am you and you are he and we are all together. 64.12.116.65 17:35, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Stop vandalizing. End of discussion. --Pilotguy (talk ¦ ✉) 21:08, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to Kevin Zegers was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 16:37, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Donald Schmuck, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- gtdp(T)/(C) 20:39, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your change to the page Beautiful was determined to be unhelpful, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks. PJM 11:20, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to Scarborough RT (TTC) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 17:37, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to Visual acuity was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 03:36, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --lightdarkness (talk) 03:36, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Kim van der Lindeat venus 18:20, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to Mafia was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 20:41, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have reverted a recent edit you made to the article Tom Swift, Jr.. You did not provide an edit summary, and I could not determine whether the edit was vandalism or a constructive contribution. In the future, please use edit summaries. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. cholmes75 16:48, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Saw III. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Rjm656s 23:20, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Chip Pickering. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. - GlenTC(Stollery) 03:40, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
05:48, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
00:43, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
