User talk:420Prince1012

Welcome!

Hi 420Prince1012! I noticed your contributions to John Katko and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Marquardtika (talk) 02:53, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Empty sections

Please don't add empty sections to articles. Even though congresspeople "will get committee assignments soon", there's no benefit to the reader to have an empty section. We can add the section when they get the assignments etc. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:37, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I wont

Stop adding successors-to-be

Will you please STOP adding elected successors to the infoboxes of lame duck officials? There was already an RFC on that topic & the result was "don't add". GoodDay (talk) 23:14, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay that's fine 420Prince1012 (talk) 23:14, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Blue Collar Caucus

added links pointing to Washington and New York

Congressional Constitution Caucus

added a link pointing to New York

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry!

Hit the rollback button by mistake, sorry! Thanks for fixing it. CoconutOctopus talk 15:34, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem

United States Attorneys appointed by Joe Biden moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, United States Attorneys appointed by Joe Biden, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Snickers2686 (talk) 02:54, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bold type in articles

Hi, I noticed you’ve been bolding links to committee assignments. In general, the only text that should be bolded is the first occurrence of the articles name in the lead. There’s more detailed guidance at MOS:BOLD. POLITANVM ^talk 04:06, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Byron Donalds

added a link pointing to Committee on Small Business

Kathy Manning

added a link pointing to Labor Caucus

Nancy Mace

added a link pointing to Committee on Veterans' Affairs

Pat Fallon

added a link pointing to Committee on Armed Services

Ronny Jackson

added a link pointing to Committee on Armed Services

William Timmons

added a link pointing to Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations

Young Kim

added a link pointing to Committee on Small Business

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

His and hers

Thanks for all the great work you've been doing around here! Just as a note, in edit summaries you have been referring to some "hers" as "his," as in here and here. Marquardtika (talk) 14:41, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Header formatting

Just a friendly reminder that section headers should only have the first letter capitalized in most cases. For instance:

Committee assignments

Caucus memberships

Assumed office

...are all the correct way to format those headers (see MOS:SECTIONCAPS).

Otherwise, thank you for all the hard work you're doing on articles related to the new administration and members of Congress! --Woko Sapien (talk) 21:32, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: United States Ambassadors appointed by Joe Biden has been accepted

United States Ambassadors appointed by Joe Biden, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

–MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 17:20, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Department of Homeland Security appointments by Joe Biden moved to draftspace

I fixed the errors you pointed out

420Prince1012 (talk) 22:13, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: United States Attorneys appointed by Joe Biden (February 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EDG 543 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You must cite your sources to establish notability. Since none have been appointed yet, you may want to consider waiting on this article until there is actually some information to include.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:United States Attorneys appointed by Joe Biden and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:United States Attorneys appointed by Joe Biden, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thanks, EDG 543 (message me) 02:19, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 420Prince1012! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Thanks, EDG 543 (message me) 02:19, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: United States Attorneys appointed by Joe Biden (February 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

So still none appointed then - not yet notable

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:United States Attorneys appointed by Joe Biden and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:United States Attorneys appointed by Joe Biden, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Section citations

Hello,

I'm not sure if you were aware, but citations don't belong in headers or section headings of an article per MOS:NOSECTIONLINKS — Please take a look at the provided link to familiarize yourself. Once a nominee is confirmed, there aren't many citations in presidential appointment lists and if there are any, most are transferred to the nominee's page specifically. Snickers2686 (talk) 22:39, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know about my mistakes. I will fix that tendency.420Prince1012 (talk) 12:59, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 20:37, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Congressional Black Caucus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Gun law in the United States into Enhanced Background Checks Act. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 12:50, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Legislative history tables

Hi! I noticed you adding a legislative history table here. Was there any tool/template you used to do it, or did you just copy and paste the format from another article? I ask since I'm interested in getting those tables to start using {{USpolabbr}}. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 18:55, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am using the insert table tool

Disambiguation link notification for March 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Executive Office appointments by Joe Biden, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Richard Moore and Michele Roberts.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to a collaboration

Based on your username and interests, I suspect you may find the 420 collaboration interesting. It will be going on all month. Cheers ☆ Bri (talk) 03:50, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 United States House of Representatives elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barry Moore.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Try to use edit summaries please!

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 15:52, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in John Kennedy (Louisiana politician), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please note that as per MOS:HEADINGS, ection headings should follow all the guidance for article titles , and should be presented in sentence case (Funding of UNESCO projects in developing countries), not title case (Funding of UNESCO Projects in Developing Countries). Your alteration by prepending titles has but some headings into mixed title & sentence case. Sentence case only, please. Furthermore, you conversion of pseudo headings to actually heading violates the intent of MOS:BADHEAD. You are making conversions without removing the '''. Please remedy your mistakes & avoid them going forward. Peaceray (talk) 16:11, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hhehdhh rshfchwd here efg

Subj efgj eggnog jetbj. R tub krgrgb egg 32.132.40.118 (talk) 16:52, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mario Diaz ballart

He is 62 years old 32.132.40.118 (talk) 16:53, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]