Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, 209.137.175.59! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bexample\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot21:57, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
"Please note, though, that removing warnings from one's own talk page is often frowned upon."
This is part of what you put on my talk page. It clearly states that removing warnings from one's own talk page is often frowned upon. This is exactly what you are doing so what is the problem? MetsFan7623:01, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ok if you feel what I am doing is wrong, then report me to AIV. If you don't know how to get there, the link is on my user page. MetsFan7600:00, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice
Hello there, there seems to be some confusion. IP talk pages should rarily blanked. This is due to many IPs being shared ones. Edits made by this IP may not always be your own and may constitute vandalism. An edit like the one made just recently to User:Blnguyen is considered vandalism. Yet an edit you made to Black sheep (term) was mistakenly reverted by me and was done in good faith by you. So please allow the warnings to stay in cases were vandalism occurs such as the instances noted above. Hope this helps.¤~Persian Poet Gal(talk)23:15, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have replied to you on my talk page. This message is in case you don't have my talk page on your watchlist, or you are an IP who doesn't have a watchlist. TeckWizTalkContribs@
Response to your comment left on my talk page: No, as I and TechWiz told you, its better not to blank your talk page. The warnings that are legitimate should remain there to indicate whether an IP has vandalized. Fortunately it seems that your IP has had rare occurences of vandalism. So this should not worry you too much. For now allow the talk page to be left alone and continue contributing as you wish. I suggest creating an account for yourself to avoid these kind of messes and edit off a clean record. Regards,¤~Persian Poet Gal(talk)23:23, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I regretfully have placed a report at WP:3RR, I will also allow administrators to carefully look over your report on me and see what they believe is the correct procedure to follow. Again please keep such disputes civil and discontinue some of the snide remarks. Thank you.¤~Persian Poet Gal(talk)00:14, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed all reports by and regarding this user from AIV -- it looks to me like this may have been a misunderstanding, and I'm not convinced that any party in this dispute has been engaging in simple vandalism. If people really insist on keeping this going, there's always WP:AN/I, but please be advised that I'd prefer we all just went our seperate ways and acted like calm people. – Luna Santin (talk)00:27, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove warnings from this page. This is not "your" page but a page for an IP which may be used by multiple users. Such warnings serve both to help deter vandals and to keep track of their activities.
If you wish your own personal userpage where you can post what you wish largely undisturbed, please create an account.
I have removed your inappropriate 3RR violation reports from the 3RR page. Those users were acting in good faith to enforce Wikipedia policies.
There's been enough of this. I've blocked you to prevent you from editing, but this block will not prevent you from getting an account and editing while you are logged in. Gamaliel07:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I'm not trolling an obvious look at my history will only show that I've done edits that are well within the limits of the wikipedia policies and I've even apollogized when I've been a jerk (Persian Poet Gal). I've even asked for clarity as to why I can not edit my wikipedia user talk page in a manner I see fit. I was then accused of trolling please I can do so much good, please get control of these admin's that have gone so bad.
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning
Please do not remove warnings from this page. This is not "your" page but a page for an IP which may be used by multiple users. Such warnings serve both to help deter vandals and to keep track of their activities.--DO11.1005:02, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!
Your IP address, 209.137.175.59/archive, is registered to Valley Forge Christian College and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.
If you are unable to create an account due to your institution's IP address being blocked, follow these instructions. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator or instructor and request that your school contact Wikimedia'sXFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.
Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using {{School block}}.
In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation. Educational institution staff and network administrators wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, 209.137.175.59! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bexample\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot21:57, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
"Please note, though, that removing warnings from one's own talk page is often frowned upon."
This is part of what you put on my talk page. It clearly states that removing warnings from one's own talk page is often frowned upon. This is exactly what you are doing so what is the problem? MetsFan7623:01, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ok if you feel what I am doing is wrong, then report me to AIV. If you don't know how to get there, the link is on my user page. MetsFan7600:00, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice
Hello there, there seems to be some confusion. IP talk pages should rarily blanked. This is due to many IPs being shared ones. Edits made by this IP may not always be your own and may constitute vandalism. An edit like the one made just recently to User:Blnguyen is considered vandalism. Yet an edit you made to Black sheep (term) was mistakenly reverted by me and was done in good faith by you. So please allow the warnings to stay in cases were vandalism occurs such as the instances noted above. Hope this helps.¤~Persian Poet Gal(talk)23:15, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have replied to you on my talk page. This message is in case you don't have my talk page on your watchlist, or you are an IP who doesn't have a watchlist. TeckWizTalkContribs@
Response to your comment left on my talk page: No, as I and TechWiz told you, its better not to blank your talk page. The warnings that are legitimate should remain there to indicate whether an IP has vandalized. Fortunately it seems that your IP has had rare occurences of vandalism. So this should not worry you too much. For now allow the talk page to be left alone and continue contributing as you wish. I suggest creating an account for yourself to avoid these kind of messes and edit off a clean record. Regards,¤~Persian Poet Gal(talk)23:23, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I regretfully have placed a report at WP:3RR, I will also allow administrators to carefully look over your report on me and see what they believe is the correct procedure to follow. Again please keep such disputes civil and discontinue some of the snide remarks. Thank you.¤~Persian Poet Gal(talk)00:14, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed all reports by and regarding this user from AIV -- it looks to me like this may have been a misunderstanding, and I'm not convinced that any party in this dispute has been engaging in simple vandalism. If people really insist on keeping this going, there's always WP:AN/I, but please be advised that I'd prefer we all just went our seperate ways and acted like calm people. – Luna Santin (talk)00:27, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove warnings from this page. This is not "your" page but a page for an IP which may be used by multiple users. Such warnings serve both to help deter vandals and to keep track of their activities.
If you wish your own personal userpage where you can post what you wish largely undisturbed, please create an account.
I have removed your inappropriate 3RR violation reports from the 3RR page. Those users were acting in good faith to enforce Wikipedia policies.
There's been enough of this. I've blocked you to prevent you from editing, but this block will not prevent you from getting an account and editing while you are logged in. Gamaliel07:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I'm not trolling an obvious look at my history will only show that I've done edits that are well within the limits of the wikipedia policies and I've even apollogized when I've been a jerk (Persian Poet Gal). I've even asked for clarity as to why I can not edit my wikipedia user talk page in a manner I see fit. I was then accused of trolling please I can do so much good, please get control of these admin's that have gone so bad.
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning
Please do not remove warnings from this page. This is not "your" page but a page for an IP which may be used by multiple users. Such warnings serve both to help deter vandals and to keep track of their activities.--DO11.1005:02, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. ˉˉanetode╦╩05:21, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
IP addresses are NOT user accounts. Any IP address may be used by more than one person. IP Address talk pages are used to keep track of all edits made from that IP address. If anyone wants to create an account they are invited to do so. It is free, and creating an account will avoid getting these messages. Furthermore, no one "owns" any page at Wikipedia even user pages and talk pages. --Jayron3205:27, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This IP address simply wants someone to write a definitive rule on user pages. The pure absurdity of this entire matter of being block makes this IP address feel distressed and wonder about current trends in human egocentrism (especially the egocentrism and (if may be added) audacity and pure puerile nature of administrators)--Socko12305:45, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Y
Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):
SharedIP, unblocking per conversation with User:Socko123. If this IP continues to contribute vandalism, a {{schoolblock}} will be instituted.
Hey, I'm glad you're enjoying contributing to Wikipedia, there's always need for more editors. I'd like to encourage you to get an account, since, as you unfortunately found out, editing as an anon from a shared IP, some users might misinterpret or sometimes even disregard your contributions. Anyway, good luck! ˉˉanetode╦╩01:17, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a legitimate warning because it wasn't vandalism please read the article before and after the edit. He is being unreasonable.
I have read the article, and the second identical revision made by you to the same article was also reverted by a different user. Thank You. --Sukh17T • C • E03:49, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please see the appropriate discussion section pertaining to the matter. It is located here. If you continue to make additional revisions, you may be blocked. --Sukh17T • C • E04:07, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You need to re-read 3RR. You have exceeded your allowed number of edits. You do not have consensus to continue editting this article. Please stop, or you will be blocked. Ronbo7605:26, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As you have noticed, I respond to comments made on my own talk page. You may want to watch the page in the future. Please visit my talk page to view my latest comment. Thank You. --Sukh17T • C • E04:23, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeat vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. John Reaves(talk)05:51, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Accusations of vandalism aside, you practically begged John Reaves to block you. I don't think that your edits to Berlinski were outright vandalism, but there is definitely a pattern of tendentious editing and some may perceive that as disruption. Here's some advice: get an account and discuss proposed changes to controversial articles on the talk page. Commenting from an anonymous IP is, sadly, equivalent to being adorned with a scarlet letter. Also, if you tone down the aggressiveness and exasperation, I think you'll find editors more accommodating and reasonable in disputes. ˉˉanetode╦╩19:28, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Trampton has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for experimenting with the page Puritan, and for reverting your edits. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. In future, please do not experiment on article pages; instead, use the sandbox. --Flex (talk|contribs) 13:02, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:209.137.175.59, you will be blocked. --TeckWizParlateContribs@ 23:10, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please read WP:3RR. This is the standard warning, please discontinue blanking your page, other people edit from this IP.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 23:53, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Immune system. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. User: Hdt83 | Talk/Chat 04:57, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Educational institution staff and network administrators wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
Please see the appropriate discussion section pertaining to the matter. It is located here. If you continue to make additional revisions, you may be blocked. --Sukh17 T • C • E 04:07, 14 March 2007 (UTC)