User talk:206.231.44.209

New messages will appear at the bottom of this page.

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your host, tso-proxy00.westport.k12.ct.us (206.231.44.209), is registered to Westport Public Schools (CT, US) and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are unable to create an account due to your institution's IP address being blocked, follow these instructions. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator or instructor and request that your school contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.

Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using {{School block}}.

In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Educational institution staff and network administrators wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

May 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm DatGoodDude342. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Matt Bevin, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! DatGoodDude342 (talk) 15:11, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Crasstun (talk | contributions) 15:39, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Billy Bob Thornton, you may be blocked from editing. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 17:21, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. —JackintheBox (talk) 13:31, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Culture of Taiwan. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:24, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Yngvadottir. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Billy Bob Thornton, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Yngvadottir (talk) 19:20, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Billy Bob Thornton— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:34, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Billy Bob Thornton. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:35, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Billy Bob Thornton, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Billy Bob Thornton was changed by 206.231.44.209 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2018-11-29T18:28:42+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:28, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019[edit]

Hello, I'm Crystallizedcarbon. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Chen Lu (figure skater)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 17:54, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Xinjiang conflict. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 12:27, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019[edit]

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to User:Jimbo Wales— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:24, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Jimbo Wales. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jeb³ _{Talk at me here} 15:31, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Jimbo Wales, you may be blocked from editing. Jeb³ _{Talk at me here} 15:31, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry 206.231.44.209 (talk) 15:34, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:56, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

206.231.44.209 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Needed for educational purposes

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:37, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

206.231.44.209 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, this is an inquiry into unblocking this IP address for school-related purposes. According to the five pillars by Wikipedia itself, Wikipedia is free content that anyone can use, edit and distribute. An unblock is needed for schoolwork to continue. Thank you

Decline reason:

Users with accounts can still edit from this IP address. Users who wish to edit may create an account at home (or request one via ACC) and edit using their account. If Wikipedia is being used to research information for schoolwork purposes, there is no need for users to be able to edit, since the block does not prevent them from reading Wikipedia. There is thus no valid reason to lift the block. Yunshui ^雲 _水 14:34, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You'll need to provide a verifiable guarantee that the vandalism has permanently ceased from this IP address. What reason do you have to believe you've been able to stop this? --Yamla (talk) 14:00, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for following up. This page is being tracked to ensure no vandalism occurs, and if it somehow does, it will be reverted and the person in question punished for their actions. Of course, it's never foolproof, and we can't exactly provide complete evidence that it's ceased, but we've taken steps to make sure that no other vandalism occurs on this IP address. 206.231.44.209 (talk) 14:09, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019[edit]

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to BB-8—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:48, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to R2-D2. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 16:48, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to C-3PO, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 16:49, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I stopped --206.231.44.209 (talk) 16:50, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

What did I do? I stopped after Serols told me to. --206.231.44.209 (talk) 17:04, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

After you promised to stop, you made this and this, which were pretty far from constructive. --Yamla (talk) 17:05, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to the sandbox don't have to be constructive? As long as it's not interfering with other editor's editing or the general reading of the site. It's an area for testing things such as wikitext. --206.231.44.209 (talk) 17:09, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"violation of the 1st amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America. If you keep removing my edits, you will be sanctioned and no longer able to edit." was clearly abusive. If you don't see that, I should probably extend the block because not only are you totally wrong about the constitution (see WP:FREE), you lack sufficient competence to edit here. --Yamla (talk) 17:11, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That...was a joke towards a bot. I don't "lack sufficient competence", and I see that as pretty insulting. I readded my sandbox material because I was still using it. --206.231.44.209 (talk) 17:15, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you can explain why the first amendment doesn't apply here and if you commit to only constructive edits from now on, I would be happy to unblock you. --Yamla (talk) 17:16, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The first amendment doesn't limit the Wikimedia Foundation's "power to exercise editorial discretion" as taken from WP:FREE. I will commit to constructive edits henceforth. --206.231.44.209 (talk) 17:18, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have lifted your block. Welcome back! Thanks for reading WP:FREE. --Yamla (talk) 17:20, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021[edit]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 16:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.

(WHOIS ^{(alt • old)}
Geolocate ^(Alternate)
Proxy Checker
Current blocks
XTools
Global contributions)
(RIRs: Africa
America
Asia-Pacific
Europe
Latin America/Caribbean)