User talk:2001:8E0:2073:CF00:D87C:4884:5D62:3458

March 2024

Hello, I'm MuffinHunter0. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Glomus tumor seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. It's really satisfying to hear that the page was of great use to you, but please do not add your own comments, as that would be considered original research, which isn't allowed. Muffin(talk page ain't working) 21:22, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

For the record, I did add back in a mention of the cold air - though I went with the wording "cold weather" since that's how most of the research is putting it; obviously because it covers both cold winds and just exposure to extremely cold air temperatures. It was a valuable and objective add to this article, especially since it's been a very common point of observation in a lot of the case studies of the last few years, but it did need a proper citation to be NPOV. It's not remotely uncommon for me to add things to articles like this, based on my own symptoms - I think I've even done that with this article specifically before - as expanding on the symptom list can be incredibly useful for people who are researching atypical presentations that only match certain symptoms. But it is important to find citations that show it's not just you who is experiencing the symptom, because without citations, Wikipedia turns into a forum instead of an encyclopedia.

I also second MuffinHunter's comments about the feedback being satisfying, but the edit log notes are not the best place to add such a comment - I've added props to the Talk page of an article, when it's been particularly well put together or otherwise notably good. CleverTitania (talk) 22:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

---