User talk:1Tolasona

Welcome!

Hello, 1Tolasona, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Punjabis, have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and how to develop articles
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• Article wizard for creating new articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! clpo13_(talk) 07:20, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Gaad, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Cahk (talk) 10:33, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Gaad. Please make your case on the page's talk page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:54, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Doug Weller talk 10:55, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Gaad

Can you explain how your academic.edu source[1] mentions something in Gaas? We don't use wiki sources, and that url gives me warnings. I'd consider unblocking you if I can find a mentor for you and a promise you'll stop creating accounts. Doug Weller talk 11:04, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

I'll be more than happy to offer to mentor you and provide you with assistance. Just let us know here, and I'll offer my availability to you and help you learn and contribute here (if you're interested). ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 11:09, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

I only need help, in page Gadri-, and im a good faith editor. But My accounts are many times blocked by administrators..

You cannot create more than one account (especially in order to bypass or evade blocks placed upon you). This is why your accounts have been blocked upon discovery. If you promise to only use this account and promise to let me know that you need help when you get stuck or have questions, then I'm sure that Doug Weller will be happy to unblock this account. Him and I agree that you seem to be simply a new editor, and that you might just not know about all of the policies and guidelines yet. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 11:21, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

True, oshwah, im a new editor and now I only want to edit in good faith.

And requesting to unblock my account again to doug.

1tolasona^{(talk) (contribs)} 11:21, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

That will be up to him. If he doesn't respond, you may need to follow the directions here (you'll add {{unblock|1=Insert your reason to be unblocked here}} to the top of this page). I'd wait at least an hour or two before doing this, as Doug Weller has familiarity with your case and is already aware of your previous responses. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 11:46, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Ok, [[[Thanks]]], oshwah, thank you...

Of course; you're very welcome. Good luck :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:01, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

From which countries you both from 1 tolasona and oshwah ~~Gadri1~~ (talk) 12:17, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

I said I'd unblock this account, continuing to create new accounts is not the way to get unblocked. It doesn't matter what countries editors are from. Doug Weller talk 12:24, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 16:04, 8 April 2016 (UTC)