User talk:199.191.106.114

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 2009[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Elizabeth Barrett Browning. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. avs5221 (talk) 14:42, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Elizabeth Barrett Browning. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Jusdafax 14:50, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Christina Rossetti. -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 14:52, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 31 hours from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Mentifisto 14:53, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Elizabeth Barrett Browning has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Until It Sleeps T • C 14:08, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Elizabeth Barrett Browning. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Anna Lincoln 14:09, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Elizabeth Barrett Browning. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Anna Lincoln 14:11, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Elizabeth Barrett Browning. Anna Lincoln 14:16, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. -- Mentifisto 14:17, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments: Blocked for 2 weeks.

November 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Jack-o'-lantern has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Marek.69 talk 14:51, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

please desist from vandalism of Heloween, no matter how cleaver you think the edit is.Slatersteven (talk) 14:58, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Jack-o'-lantern has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. The thing that should not be 14:50, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Jack-o'-lantern. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Jusdafax 14:54, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Jack-o'-lantern. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Jusdafax 14:56, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Dodgeball has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 16:25, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Dodgeball. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 16:31, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Archery. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 16:37, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Andy Reed has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. --RrburkeekrubrR 15:21, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Arch bridge, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Arch bridge was changed by 199.191.106.114 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-02-24T17:04:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:04, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Truss bridge. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 17:06, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Arch bridge. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 17:06, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Arch bridge. Uncle Dick (talk) 17:07, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for three months[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

--PMDrive1061 (talk) 17:09, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Theta Delta Chi has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 14:52, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make test edits to articles, as you did with this edit to William Wordsworth, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits constitute vandalism, and will be reverted. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 15:01, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to William Wordsworth. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 15:08, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to William Wordsworth. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 15:09, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010[edit]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wade–Davis Bill, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Peter Karlsen (talk) 18:33, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
To edit, please log in.

Editing by anonymous users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled. Registered users, however, are still able to edit. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, you may use this form to request a username. Alternatively, you may email us with your preferred username. Either way, use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. If using the form, please reference this block in the comment section.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. TNXMan 18:48, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jimmy Page, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jimmy Page was changed by 199.191.106.114 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854074 on 2011-05-18T14:13:46+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:14, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011[edit]

Hello and welcome! I edit Wikipedia too, under the username Falcon8765. Wikipedia is written by people like you and me, so thank you for taking the time to participate. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to John Yates Beall with this edit, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions about editing, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Falcon8765 (TALK) 18:21, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John Yates Beall. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: John Yates Beall was changed by 199.191.106.114 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2011-10-06T18:34:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:34, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

October 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Ginsuloft. An edit that you recently made to Coat of arms of Pope Francis seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Ginsuloft (talk) 14:02, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Henry Ossawa Tanner because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. — MusikAnimal talk 17:01, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:199.191.106.114&oldid=1144976153"