User talk:150.199.98.33

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 150.199.98.33, is registered to Missouri Research and Education Network and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are unable to create an account due to your institution's IP address being blocked, follow these instructions. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator or instructor and request that your school contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.

Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using {{School block}}.

In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Educational institution staff and network administrators wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Baltimore and Ohio Railroad, are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Slambo (Speak) 14:42, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Champ Bailey. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ‑ MANdARAX XAЯAbИAM (talk) 19:42, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Champ Bailey. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. -- lucasbfr ^talk 19:57, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to History of Scandinavia. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. →Christian .И 14:03, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Champ Bailey has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Epbr123 (talk) 16:26, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Champ Bailey. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Champ Bailey was changed by 150.199.98.33 (u) (t) deleting 7588 characters on 2008-05-19T16:31:17+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:31, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008[edit]

Your recent edit to Paul Delano (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 16:11, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make test edits to articles, as you did with this edit to Paul Delano, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits constitute vandalism, and will be reverted. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 16:12, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Kanonkas : Talk 16:21, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Civil Rights Act of 1866, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Civil Rights Act of 1866 was changed by 150.199.98.33 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-03-16T15:21:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:21, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009[edit]

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Mumps worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. RegentsPark (My narrowboat) 18:12, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Perfect World has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Kingpin13 (talk) 14:49, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at William T. Anderson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 16:16, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012[edit]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Laos, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 13:24, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Isthmus of Panama was changed by 150.199.98.33 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952648 on 2012-10-03T19:26:05+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:26, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Denisarona. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Italian cuisine because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Denisarona (talk) 15:35, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at History of Western subcultures in the 20th century, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 02:58, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2016[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to David Elkind has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: David Elkind was changed by 150.199.98.33 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.873606 on 2016-02-22T14:34:30+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:34, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mark Curry (actor) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mark Curry (actor) was changed by 150.199.98.33 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.965897 on 2016-03-29T13:52:15+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019[edit]

Hello, I'm Peaceray. I noticed that you recently removed content from Wolfgang Puck without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Peaceray (talk) 14:59, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]