User talk:146.90.155.97

December 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Palatalization (sound change), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Aishik Rehman (talk) 20:49, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Iwaqarhashmi. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Presidency of John F. Kennedy have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:57, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add flag icons to infoboxes - it is discouraged. See MOS:INFOBOXFLAG - "Generally, flag icons should not be used in infoboxes..". Ghmyrtle (talk) 17:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ainsley. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tarheel95 (Talk) 21:51, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce incorrect pronouns into an article, as you did with Amy Klobuchar, you may be blocked from editing. CastJared (talk) 08:24, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Ditto for your test edits to Doug Hutchison here and here. Nightscream (talk) 20:05, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Adding mentions in online game shows

Hello,

I've reverted your edit on Hagia Sophia. Please read Wikipedia:Popularculture and consider whether something is notable and really useful to the reader of the article you're editing. David12345 (talk) 10:42, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Olivadeynzer (January 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Olivadeynzer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:15, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello, 146.90.155.97! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 21:15, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

UK motorways

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to M5 motorway, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:06, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

I used the article on England to back up that statement which is against Wikipedia guidelines for using other articles as sources. 146.90.155.97 12:11, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

That article doesn't explicitly say there are seven major motorways, it just gives examples chosen at the authors' discretion. But even if it did say that, it would need a source. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:21, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

I consider them to be the 7 main ones. 146.90.155.97 12:22, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

But that's just one person's opinion. Wikipedia is interested in what reliable sources say, not our opinions. Personally I would dispute the inclusion of the M60 on the list, at least without including the 42, but I'm not a reliable source either. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:28, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Birmingham does not have a ring road unlike London and Manchester and the M42 does not count as a major motorway. The list is:

• M1
• M4
• M5
• M6
• M25
• M60
• M62

146.90.155.97 12:30, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at M5 motorway, you may be blocked from editing. 10mmsocket (talk) 13:25, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 16:48, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

My edits were quite fair. 146.90.155.97 17:02, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Crystallizedcarbon. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Sliced bread—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 18:08, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:32, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

---