Jump to content

User talk:14.139.220.33

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.

April 2012[edit]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Quark, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:59, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012[edit]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Chemical potential , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 14:06, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Geniac. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Akshay Kumar filmography, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 04:56, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Tolly4bolly. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Suresh Raina, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Tolly4bolly 15:18, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Love wave that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 09:46, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Love wave with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Oliverlyc 09:47, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Jeffrd10. An edit that you recently made to The Farewell Sermon seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Jeffrd10 (talk) 13:40, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Lugia2453. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Mohanlal filmography— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lugia2453 (talk) 16:40, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2015[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Jay-Sebastos. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jay Σεβαστόςdiscuss 15:05, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2017[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm GrapefruitSculpin. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Convolution theorem have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. GS 04:35, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Convolution theorem. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Home Lander (talk) 16:57, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Aaja Nachle[edit]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Aaja Nachle, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 07:52, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Microorganism have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 10:49, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Hello, I'm Cannolis. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Violacein— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Cannolis (talk) 07:32, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Demagnetizing field, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. 73.96.112.132 (talk) 20:21, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop making disruptive edits.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 19:24, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2017[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm JohnBlackburne. I noticed that you recently removed content from Periodic table without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 11:26, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Muhandes. I noticed that you made a change to an article, V. Balakrishnan (physicist), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 16:23, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:REDX.io, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:REDX.io, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:REDX.io[edit]

Hello, 14.139.220.33. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "REDX.io".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Home Lander (talk) 14:09, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tennis rankings[edit]

Hello. Please do not add fictional tennis rankings to articles, as you did to Juan Martín del Potro. There is no Sunday ranking update on the ATP. The official ATP Rankings are only updated on Monday. You always have to wait for the official update on Monday. You cannot change the rankings ahead of time. No precalculated, projected rankings on Wikipedia. Only official ATP rankings. Thanks.—J. M. (talk) 17:08, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Again—please stop adding future tennis rankings. You cannot do that on Wikipedia. Thanks.—J. M. (talk) 22:41, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm ToBeFree. An edit you recently made to Lipid raft seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:45, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits to Wikipedia pages, such as the one you made with this edit to Supramolecular polymers, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:45, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Devkinandan Thakur, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 18:02, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018[edit]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 08:11, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


April 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Denisarona. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Metamaterial cloaking have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 14:38, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rahul Banerjee (scientist). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 14:39, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello. Your recent edit to Kuldeep appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. CptViraj (📧) 18:11, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm TheEpTic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Magnetic field—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. TheEpTic (talk) 11:34, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm AntiCedros. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to University of Calcutta have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. AntiCedros (talk) 19:25, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Godi Media (March 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AaqibAnjum was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 21:05, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, 14.139.220.33! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 21:05, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]