User talk:12Doc

March 2017

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Judy Genshaft have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 11:34, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Judy Genshaft. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. ProgrammingGeek ^talktome 13:26, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Judy Genshaft shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:29, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Your message you left here

Please see Wikipedia:No legal threats. If you're implying any kind of legal threat or action, as your message at the URL above may have, your account must be indefinitely blocked until you retract it. Please clarify your statement. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:35, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for edit warring, as you did at Judy Genshaft. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:43, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Judy Genshaft has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Judy Genshaft was changed by 12Doc (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.907594 on 2017-04-10T14:00:17+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:00, 10 April 2017 (UTC)