User talk:113.91.211.173

May 2018

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Tetralophodon. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. JustBerry (talk) 02:18, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

To User:Justcallmesam

@Justcallmesam: Please stop with the "is this a valid genus" crap. You do remember that that habit of yours got you blocked for a while a couple times last year, right? Right?--Mr Fink (talk) 02:35, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Paleopsilopterus. Stop putting the "valid genus" crap, @Justcallmesam:.--Mr Fink (talk) 03:15, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  5 albert square (talk) 05:30, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

---