User talk:109.107.224.189

Welcome!

Hi 109.107.224.189! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!

Egyptian Arabic

I didn't understand your incoherent comments [1], [2]. What did you mean or what did you misunderstand?

It is easier to read with "autonym" as what the language calls itself. The other paragraph had meant "Literary Arabic", as Egyptians don't use an equivalent term to "Standard Arabic". There is no Standard Arabic, it's Literary Arabic which is Classical Arabic. Distinguishing Classical Arabic from contemporary written Arabic is just what English speakers like to do.

Please, watch what you write and know what you do. Thanks. --Esperfulmo (talk) 23:04, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Adding the term (autonym) instead of (Arabic) is completely illogical and has nothing to do with ease, and where did you come from that there is no classical Arabic language?? This is completely wrong, and literary language is the same as classical language, so your amendments are literally sabotage and unrealistic or logical claims. The state of the article like this is better than having the amendments that you want to make. 109.107.224.189 (talk) 23:31, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello again, user. Please, sign in to recognize you.

The word autonym is left for you for reference.

Answering your wondering

The article is called Egyptian Arabic and again the bracketed notice has the word Arabic repeated. How eloquent is this?

Re-read my earlier comment and if you have concerns, please write them on the article's talk page and always ask to suggest a better edit.

Always remember, no edit warring, no personal attacks, assuming good faith, respect others. Thanks. --Esperfulmo (talk) Esperfulmo (talk) 00:03, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

I know the meaning of (autonym) and what it is, but this is not its place. At the beginning of the article it is written that the previous words are translated into Arabic, which is the language of Egypt, and there is no place or relationship to the phrase (autonym) as you think, and no, the Arabic word was not repeated, but rather different terms were written in Arabic. This is normal, this is its nature, and I have no fears. Let’s be realistic. It is clear that you are the one who has fears that push you to sabotage the article in this way and make it worse. The article is like this, especially in the introduction, and what you are doing is not developing, but rather diminishing the value of the article and literally sabotaging it, so Be logical and realistic, thanks 109.107.224.189 (talk) 00:12, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

---