User talk:Trailblazer101

Welcome to my talk page. Please adhere to the talk page guidelines and particularly the following:

It is easiest to use the "Add topic" link at the top of a talk page and "[ reply ]" link following each post but you may edit this page directly if you follow the above-mentioned guidelines.

If you choose to edit the page directly, please observe the following in addition to anything else in the above-mentioned guidelines:

Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page.
Please sign and date your entry by inserting "~~~~" at the end.
Please specify a descriptive subject or headline for a new topic and separate subtopics by ===heading=== lines, if needed.
Please indent your posts with one more ":" than what you are replying to, i.e. begin with ":" if replying to an existing topic and "::" if replying to a reply.

Regarding replies and notifications:

I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your Talk page (or the article Talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or use the "[ subscribe ]" link by each thread heading,or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply.
If I left you a message; please answer on the page where the message was left, using {{ping|Username}}, {{reply to|Username}} or {{u|Username}} in your response, or add {{talkback|Username}} or {{whisperback|Username}} to my talk page. If you leave me a message here, I will answer here on my talk page, notifying you in the same manner.

⇒ Start a new Talk topic.

Please don't template me! Everybody makes mistakes, and this user finds user warning templates impersonal and disrespectful. If there's something you'd like to say, please take a moment to write a comment below in your own words.

Trailblazer101 is busy off-on and may not respond swiftly to queries.

It is 11:30 AM where this user lives.

Marvel Studios

Hi. I don't think I've the time to take on this GA review. Just one comment in case it gets missed on the GAR: corporations are singular not plural, so for example "Marvel had licensed out the film rights to many of their" > "Marvel had licensed out the film rights to many of its". This error occurs quite a lot throughout. Mark83 (talk) 11:15, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing that out to me! I really appreciate it. No worries on the GA review, I'm sure someone else could pick it up, but I understand if no one does anytime soon. I'm patient. Trailblazer101 (talk) 01:12, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Just an FYI that the next GA backlog drive is in May, so if it doesn't get picked up in the next couple of months there is a good chance it could be picked up then. - adamstom97 (talk) 07:50, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sweet! That's good to know, thank you. Trailblazer101 (talk) 12:01, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You've made a goof!

I notice beyond this instance on First Steps when you try to explain to other editors about sources by self-published subject-matter experts (especially and, actually exclusively when talking about Jeff Sneider), you're linking the shortcut Wikipedia:Subject-matter expert. That is an essay about Wikipedia editors who are field experts. You're probably looking for Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published_sources, which is accessed by the WP:SPS shortcut.

Didn't figure this was troutable. Hope you're doing well! Barnt Toust 01:04, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, yes. That is what I was referring to. Thanks for pointing that out to me! I loose sight of some details like this, so it's good having someone checking. I'll add it to my list of links at my page so I don't forget. Trailblazer101 (talk) 04:39, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Iger

Hi Trailblazer - Are you still editing the Bob Iger page? Wasn't sure and wanted to check. SPasell (talk) 19:58, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is still on my watchlist, though it is not an article I proactively edit unless necessary. If you are inquiring about your message at the talk from a few months back, you can always WP:Be bold and add the information with the adequate sources yourself. While I appreciate your willingness to double check ahead of time, there is no harm in doing so. :) Trailblazer101 (talk) 22:05, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Faith?

Hi mate,

Every contribution I have made to the Brave New World has resulted in a response from yourself. The contents of which are far from useful to the discussion.

I would believe it has been done in good faith but the your comments have not shown that this is the case.

Please refrain from replying further. As advised, they will be set aside.

Thanks.

~~ 2A02:C7C:8469:C700:B8C8:AB41:47A6:1E8D (talk) 17:50, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am merely informing you how the specific process is being done for this article, which is currently in a unique situation given other recent disputes surrounding it outside of the discussion about the reception. It has absolutely nothing to do with you. I gave you advice on how to address positive reviews you want included, so if you find any reviews of such, we can then add them in. It is that simple. Trailblazer101 (talk) 18:40, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like textbook gish galloping to me. You aren’t necessarily “informing” you are replying to everything single comment I make on that discussion.

I haven’t even mentioned wanting positive reviews included.

My position stands. 2A02:C7C:8469:C700:B8C8:AB41:47A6:1E8D (talk) 19:15, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing precludes me from responding to discussions on an article I proactively edit. If you cannot work constructively and civily with other contributors, then I would encourage you to cease your activities on this site. Trailblazer101 (talk) 19:17, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's a brave new world

Don't feel bad if you decide that you need to take a break from the article. I have a few franchises on my watchlist (mainly the new Star Trek shows and The Rings of Power) that have attracted similar heated responses due to controversies and audience backlash, etc. These strong feelings tend to fade away, for the most part, with time. - adamstom97 (talk) 16:47, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Heheh, thank you for that. I tend not to take care of my mental state always, but I love a good debate and have grown quite used to these heated controversies, especially in recent months. I'm probably going to be responding less and less now that it seems it is going nowhere before I ultimately hand the bat off to you, man, especially because I have other real-world responsibilities ramping up soon that will require much more of my serious attention. I appreciate all of your work and dedication in handling this. I do think the current ECP of the article has massively contributed to an increase in talk comments, though that was a risk I was willing to take. Trailblazer101 (talk) 16:54, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]