User talk:09violet06
Welcome![edit]
|
June 2017[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Michael DeLorenzo has been reverted.
Your edit here to Michael DeLorenzo was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/https://www.facebook.com/mdelorenzo) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:30, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you XLinkBot! I appreciate your comment as I learned something new. 09violet06 (talk) 18:17, 30 January 2018
09violet06, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi 09violet06! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:05, 29 June 2017 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, 09violet06. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Managing a conflict of interest[edit]
Hello, 09violet06. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Michael DeLorenzo, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID). Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 04:01, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- ---Hi Grayfell! I just wanted to address your comment about conflict of interest on my talk page. I started as an editor with Wikipedia in hopes to contribute my research capabilities to this knowledge community. The first article I chose was out of my personal interest. I found the article to have alot of issues which seems to be common themes of biographies in Wikipedia. The article needed a lot of help. I've been conducting extensive research to be able to provide content and reference to the subject matter. That is what I am hoping to do for my contribution to Wikipedia articles that might lack content. There is no conflict of interest because I have no connection or association with the subject matter except that I enjoyed a television show associated with the person in the past. I think biographies in general need a lot of work on Wikipedia and I hope I can do my part in the contribution. I also want to finish what I started and when I find new references of information I want to update the articles that I lend my research abilities to. I hope this clarifies any questions regarding my involvement in the article. Thank you! 09violet06 (talk) 18:09, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- Hello. First, I apologize for the redundant template. It appears you have already received this template in the past and had deleted it, so that was a mistake on my part.
- As for having a conflict of interest, your thoroughness is appreciated, but you have been adding questionable sources and vaguely promotional material to the article, and have not substantially edited any other article in over a hundred edits spanning several months. Additionally, that article has several such "WP:SPAs", so I hope you can understand why these are red flags. As you've noticed, biographies need a lot of work, and one of the reasons they need work is because of undisclosed paid editing and other forms of spam. This is especially common among working media figures (motivational speakers being among the worst offenders, but that's a digression).
- The best approach is to summarize reliable, independent sources. Instead of finding sources for every single item that's already in the article, find out what reliable, independent sources are saying, and consider trimming the rest out of the article. WP:PRIMARY sources sometimes usable, but are of limited value, especially in WP:BLP articles.
- It appears that the article has an active talk page, so I would suggest participating there if you're dead-set on only contributing to this article. Otherwise, I encourage you to expand your horizons a bit.
- As a technical note, I moved your comments on my talk page to the bottom of the page, per WP:BOTTOMPOST. The section you added your comment to was about an entirely unrelated issue, so it was unnecessarily confusing. Grayfell (talk) 02:48, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
—Hi Greyfell, Thank you for your comments. I’m glad you added the text back because I made an error in responding and wasn’t sure how to re-input the text for my response to be applicable. First time discovering talk page errors as you can see. So hopefully with your feed back I can improve my talk page involvement. So thank you! In regards to this article, I picked this article to start with and as you’ve mentioned it’s taking up a lot of time on the research. At first I pulled a lot of the information off the individual source but once I started finding more news source references I started to replace the single source references problem that I seemed to have first created. Also some of the reference were pre-existing prior to my involvement and I didn’t want to take that away from other contributors. So I found their sources and updated the reference text but your right, it’s not necessary the correct format. I’ll take your feed back into consideration and practice for my contributions. I do plan on expanding my editing contributions to other topics. Hopefully as I develop my profile I can be accepted as a serious editor to the Wikipedia community. I appreciate all your feed back in the process.09violet06 (talk) 9:55, 1 February 2018
January 2018[edit]
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Michael DeLorenzo . Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 20:22, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Ronz, Thank you for your comment. I will look over the reference materials that you've identified for me. Thank you for that. It would also be helpful if you could identify for me a sample of what you thought was a poorly referenced source. I hope to contribute to the Wikipedia articles in an effective way and I appreciate any opportunity to learn from any mistakes. Thank you. 09violet06 (talk) 18:13, 30 January 2018
- Overall, the references you added appear helpful, though I've not reviewed them all.
- Your edit summaries make it difficult to determine what you were doing and why. In at least one case you removed references and material verified by those references without any indication as to why. My main concern was your adding the birth date without a reference, apparently unaware of the discussion on the article talk page. Please join the talk page discussions. --Ronz (talk) 16:41, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
—Hi Ronz, thank you for your feed back. I see why edit summaries are important. I’ll take your suggestions and be more prompt about the edit summaries so that I’m more clear on my contributions. I also read the talk page and will follow your lead on the issue about birth date. I think you make a valid ethical point. Thank you for your feed back and comments. Much appreciated.09violet06 (talk) 10:09, 1 February 2018
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, 09violet06. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, 09violet06. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)