Jump to content

User talk:عمادالدين اسحاق

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

New Unblock Request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

عمادالدين اسحاق (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

@AaqibAnjum: @Huon: @Deepfriedokra: It has been about a few months now since I have been blocked. I have been trying to edit on Urdu Wikipedia but I cannot contribute as much as I would be able to on English Wikipedia. I have thought of many pages I would like to edit in English and have a lot of knowledge on West Yorkshire as I live in this area. I could add valuable information regarding my local area in regards to its people, demographics, as well as its history. Also, the lockdown is taking a toll on my mental health; what better than share valuable knowledge on Wikipedia in this vast amount of spare time?

Please unblock me... 🙏🏼

For the sake of knowledge and my mental health, at least!?

:: @عمادالدين اسحاق: You are still blocked on English Wikipedia. But, if your primary focus is Urdu and Arabic speaking people as you said earlier, you should contribute to Urdu and Arabic Wikipedia. The way to sign a message is to add 4 tides ~~~~ at the end of message. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 21:07, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with AaqibAnjum's suggestion above. If you do make significant constructive edits to another project and then come back and request an unblock (say in a month or two), it would likely be accepted.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:35, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
However a note, If you resort to editing/improving Urdu Wikipedia then I'll be following your edits there as well. If you make good contributions and show that you understand Wikipedia policies, I'll ask for unblock on your behalf. Best - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 04:38, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@AaqibAnjum: Note that, though you could support an unblock, per Wikipedia:Appealing a block the appeal itself would need to be made by عمادالدين اسحاق.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 16:25, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Please include a decline or accept reason.


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Translating Pages on Wikipedia[edit]

@AaqibAnjum: @Huon: @Deepfriedokra: I want to write the translation for some pages in English into Urdu and vice versa. How do I do this? عمادالدين اسحاق (talk) 15:09, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm AaqibAnjum. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. I have reverted all your edits which deem to be self promoting. Please don't use Wikipedia for self promotion. Thanks. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 19:41, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Imaadudeen Ishaq[edit]

Hello, عمادالدين اسحاق

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Imaadudeen Ishaq for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 21:33, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article about yourself, at Imaadudeen Ishaq. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 21:35, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Imad al-Din. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 21:37, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Imaadudeen Ishaq[edit]

Hello عمادالدين اسحاق,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Imaadudeen Ishaq for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 22:04, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 22:07, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Imad al-Din. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 22:13, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Using Wikipedia solely for promotion[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:18, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

عمادالدين اسحاق (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I should be unblocked because I am new to editing on Wikipedia and didn't understand what the user page was. I am also an alumnus of Batley Grammar School and was meant to add my name on the page. Also, I am a dai' which is the reason why I added my name to the page titled "list of dai's". I understood now that this has violated the terms and conditions and apologise. I am very sorry for any disruption caused. I will not do this again as I can evidently see that this seems unnecessary. Please do not block me from editing as I really do want to share some k owledge on Wikipedia.

In conclusion, blocking me is one less person to do editing on this encyclopedia. I rely enjoy editing and would like to apologise and redeem myself for the disruptive behaviour.

Thank you for taking the time to read.

Decline reason:

You say below that you aren't merely here to write about yourself. I failed to find a single significant edit of yours that didn't just add your name to some article or another, though. I don't see any attempt to "make Wikipedia more accessible" to anybody or to share any information that wasn't about yourself, and I don't see how unblocking you would improve the encyclopedia. Huon (talk) 22:32, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Huon: I have edited by transliterating English texts into Urdu properly and also by adding captions to pictures. I can only edit in English if I am unblocked. Therefore, only if I am unblocked can I edit in English. Please unblock me, I really enjoy editing on Wikipedia and enhancing mine and hopefully others' knowledge.

Also this is the first time I am signing my messages as I didn't know how to before. Thanks to brother Aaqib who has taught me how to. عمادالدين اسحاق (talk) 21:16, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Huon: @AaqibAnjum: Also, why is my user page still blocked? Isn't that meant to be my page? Or is it included in the block when you block my IP address? عمادالدين اسحاق (talk) 23:34, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have used both unblock templates because I really do not understand how this works. I just want to resume editing on Wikipedia and redeem myself for my disruptions. 😕 😔 ❓

When you are blocked, the only page you can still edit is this user talk page, and the sole reason you're not blocked here as well is to give you an opportunity to contest the block. Your user page is not something you can use for any purpose but a place to provide information about yourself as an editor of Wikipedia. Below there are comments that outline a way forward for you. Huon (talk) 22:26, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


UTRS[edit]

UTRS #30540 was submitted on 2020-05-12 23:42:19. This review is now closed.
--Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 10:09, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 17:35, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please Unblock[edit]

@Deepfriedokra: @AaqibAnjum: I am new to editing on Wikipedia. Please just inform me if you feel that I am doing something incorrectly. I would really appreciate it if you 'mentor' me if that is the right word. My only purpose is not to add my name to Wikipedia but to impart knowledge and make Wikipedia more accessible to those who speak Arabic and Urdu. I once again apologise for my actions. I am new to editing on Wikipedia. Please unblock me. I will really appreciate it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by عمادالدين اسحاق (talkcontribs)

@عمادالدين اسحاق: - You should always sign your messages. If you want to help Wikipedia with Arabic and Urdu, you may resort to improve Urdu and Arabic Wikipedia which are located at ar.wikipedia.org and ur.wikipedia.org . Best. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 18:03, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@AaqibAnjum: Thank you very much, does this mean you have unblocked me now? Another question - how do I sign my messages? — Preceding unsigned comment added by عمادالدين اسحاق (talkcontribs)

@عمادالدين اسحاق: You are still blocked on English Wikipedia. But, if your primary focus is Urdu and Arabic speaking people as you said earlier, you should contribute to Urdu and Arabic Wikipedia. The way to sign a message is to add 4 tides ~~~~ at the end of message. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 21:07, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with AaqibAnjum's suggestion above. If you do make significant constructive edits to another project and then come back and request an unblock (say in a month or two), it would likely be accepted.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:35, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
However a note, If you resort to editing/improving Urdu Wikipedia then I'll be following your edits there as well. If you make good contributions and show that you understand Wikipedia policies, I'll ask for unblock on your behalf. Best - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 04:38, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@AaqibAnjum: Note that, though you could support an unblock, per Wikipedia:Appealing a block the appeal itself would need to be made by عمادالدين اسحاق.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 16:25, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]