User:Thnidu/Egoboo

"persuasive"

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohamed Mahmoud Abd Al-Wahhab:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. Thnidu's comments are persuasive, and do not conflict with the view of the other editors here that this does not currently belong in the article mainspace. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 18:21, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Mohamed Mahmoud Abd Al-Wahhab

Mohamed Mahmoud Abd Al-Wahhab (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking non-trivial, in-depth support. reddogsix (talk) 18:35, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:48, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

• Delete Poorly sourced to Facebook, Youtube and Linked in, completely fails WP:GNG. Theroadislong (talk) 19:12, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:35, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:35, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

• Delete No reliable source. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:34, 22 July 2017 (UTC).
• Move to draft space The author is a novice here and unfamiliar with our requirements. See their request at the Teahouse and my comments to them. I would prefer to engage the author in a discussion and train them to be a functional Wikipedian, rather than delete their first article and quite possibly leave them upset and disappointed; that smacks of biting the newbies. Even if the article is deleted after that, wouldn't you rather have an aspiring new editor in our ranks than a newbie leaving, disappointed and annoyed? --Thnidu (talk) 20:04, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.