User:Stacyargueta/Allergy test/Amart764 Peer Review

Peer review

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

• Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
  • Stacyargueta
• Link to draft you're reviewing:
  • Allergy test

Lead

Guiding questions:

• Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
  • Yes.
• Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
  • Yes, it is clear and states the purpose of their article.
• Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
  • Not specifically, but it does allude to it.
• Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
  • No, it served as an umbrella.
• Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
  • It is concise.

Content

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added relevant to the topic?
  • Yes, it is about allergy testing- reasons, explanations and examples are given.
• Is the content added up-to-date?
  • Yes, sources are recent.
• Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
  • No.

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added neutral?
  • Yes, there is no opinion.
• Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
  • No, it is very straight forward.
• Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
  • No, there is an introduction and then an analysis.
• Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
  • No, it is just explanatory.

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

• Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
  • Yes.
• Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
  • Yes.
• Are the sources current?
  • Yes.
• Check a few links. Do they work?
  • Yes.

Organization

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
  • Yes.
• Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
  • No.
• Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
  • Yes, but maybe a header or subsection title can be added.

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

• Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
  • Yes.
• What are the strengths of the content added?
  • More detail has been given.
• How can the content added be improved?
  • Continue explanations in different parts of allergy testing field, maybe protocols for example. Author can add table of contents and sections.