User:Scottperry/simulated-email-conversation-1
This is a Virtual Talk Page. This virtual Talk page (or Post-conversation-talk-page), is the "Talk page" for the "User:Scottperry's Simulated email conversation 1" page. This is a "Special" Post-conversation-talk-page. This page is situated under the "user page" tab above. For more on this virtual conversation, please visit this virtual Talk page's virtual Conversation page (same as "Talk page" tab above). As it turns out, in this experimental conversation, the "talk" tab and the "user" tab have ended up effectively or functionally being "flipped."
Rules for commenting here[edit]
Note to welcome third party observers: The conversation on what perhaps could rightfully be called the "Conversation page" (called the "Talk page" on the tab above) has been structured such that it might provide some of the certain interactive benefits of traditional email, yet also provide the additional benefit of being entirely "transparent," and therefore not generally intended to encourage the use of any forms of "negative coercion" that fully private, and therefore opaque, emails can sometimes tend to engender. The two discussion participants have agreed in advance to ask any third parties who may wish to comment on this discussion, to please only do so after the two participants have concluded their discussion as described in the Conversation page. After the conversation has concluded, please leave whatever comments, questions, helpful suggestions or thoughts which you may have about this conversation, on this page below. Thanks.
In case anyone else may have any questions for me about what I have proposed, (not about me) I am now occasionally watching this page. Scott P. (talk) 16:09, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- As promised, it is now 05:00 May 12, 2017, UTC. I will remain here seated before this page until 05:15 to see if anyone might arrive with any questions, then depart for approximately one week.
- I thank all of my colleague editors here in Wikipedia. You know if I was doing this in certain religious institutions right about now, I have little doubt something "really bad" would probably have happened to me about 1 hour into it, and if I had persisted for 2, I would have been indefinately banned. If I had attempted to stealthily climb back over the walls, ninja style as a new User:ID, and then returned to harrass similarly, I would have had the FBI on my tail as a terrorist at the very least, and probably even worse as a heritic no less!!!! I do thank each and every one of you for your kindly toleration of my antics of the last few days. It truly does give me very great hope for our entire kind.
- Well my friends, I must be on my way. I again thank you all for the good faith you have oh so often demonstrated towards myself over the last few days.
- Scott P. (talk) 05:16, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- Wait you're a sock too? I guess not one of my master's or s/he would have let me know</humor>. Are you going to come back and help me resolve this biting issue as you promised, or should I have been doing this by myself all along? I think a good outcome is possible here simply by the legitimate used of socks (which bite back when bitten). Rex Iudaeorum (talk) 10:52, 15 May 2017 (UTC)