User:Sarahcole

Tao-te ching

Tao-te ching is the most famous and translated work from the Taoist inheritance. Its traditional author, Lao-tzu, is the most popular in this matter. Even in ancient China the work enjoyed a great popularity and was glossed both by Taoists and Confucianists.

History - Structure - Philosophy

According to tradition, the work originates in the 4-th century BC, but recent discoveries showed that it is no early than the 4-th or 3-rd century. The oldest existing copy is from 206 or 195 BC.

Lao-tzu would have composed this work by the request of Yin Hsi, the Guardian of the Mountain Pass, while he began his wandering towards West.

The book consists of 81 short chapters among which 37 form the first part, the Classic of the Way (tao), and the next 44 form the Classic of Te ("Te" is a word translated by James Legge in relation with "Tao" as "characteristics").

Its division in chapters is considered to be the result of the remarks of mysterious Heschang Gong (Han dynasty).

The philosophy of this work focused on concepts like: tao and te. Other main ideas are wu-wei (usually translated by nondoing) and fu (the return of all things to their origins).

The goal of the Taoist philosophy is, according to the scholars, to become one with tao, inwardly achieving the universal rule of the return to origins. But for this purpose the aspirant has to achieve the emptiness (wu) and to practice the nondoing.

However, we must not ignore the fact that Tao-te ching is a composite work (although its unity is asserted or wished) which, the same way as I-ching, underwent influences and taints in the most various ways.

The second part of the book seems to be compiled by the Confucianists because it dwells unlawfully much on the art of governing, and the Taoists didn't show interested in this aspect. It is also true that the art of governing is related to the Tao (or from the imitation of Tao) and its characteristics (Te).

Today, Tao-te ching is being considered the Bible of Taoism. However, it remains further on obscure and almost impossible to be explained book. The review authors always offer us selected aphorisms from the first part of the book, interpreted - in the cases that interpretation is possible - from Christian ethics or dogmatic esoteric philosophies point of view, whichever flourish nowadays.