User:S/Archives/Archive 12

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Klara Prast[edit]

I was reading the talk page for this character, and noticed that User:Sup3rior came in to help defend against the attempts to delete this article, and that redirects to here so I am presuming you have renamed a past identity. One thing I was curious about, is prior to those postings, RauJ is reverted by IPs defending the article, respectively 69.138 and 76.214. It got me curious if those were possibly you on past occasions and that defending this character amongst other things may have been a motivation to register for Wikipedia? I notice a lot of people edit randomly and then decide to become more involve to help preserve important information. Sup3 lists no contributions despite having edited the talk page so I am presuming they were moved to a new account, which I didn't know was possible which is pretty cool. Your earliest is Aug 2, 2007, whereas the IPs started helping out in June 2008, so I may be wrong in my assumption though :) Both IPs have been defending Klara against the censoring of references, one making some other edits related to the Marvel universe too. Runaways seems like a very interesting series, after reading all the spoilers I plan to pick it up some day to experience it first hand.

- Anyway since you're the only 'name' listed, I'm wondering what you thought of my Klara Prast = Chloroplast theory? I added mention of the similarity to the article. It just seems too much of a coincidence. Tyciol (talk) 01:21, 7 September 2008 (UTC) - :Actually I checked the history, someone added that observation before and the guy reverted it, so it's not just me noticing it either. Tyciol (talk) 21:09, 7 September 2008 (UTC) - ::I guess it'd be a good idea but I wouldn't be able to add anything since I hadn't read it :) To tell you the truth, Klara seems notable enough to deserve her own article so I really think if that was made she should stay put :) Yeah, it looks great, I've seen art of these chars on an art site I go to and would like to understand how they really are. Tyciol (talk) 01:28, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Re:Out of curiousity[edit]

- To avoid any mass deletions, we now try to avoid giving future episodes (even if they have info) a page unless they have a confirmed specific airdate (BTW, you used the wrong title. The correct version is "The Good, The Sad and the Drugly" without the , before and). Treehouse of Horror XIX is an exception because it is a fairly high profile episode, but you are more than welcome to merge it if you wish. -- Scorpion0422 00:39, 9 September 2008 (UTC) - :Agreeable. A (Reply!,Contribs!) 02:16, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Adjuticator[edit]

- - Thanks for clarifying how the Adjuticator is not actually Frank, it helped a lot. Lots42 (talk) 18:52, 10 September 2008 (UTC) - - ==Image copyright problem with Image:GertandChase.jpg== - Thanks for uploading Image:GertandChase.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which is totally gay explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check - - :* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in. - :* That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page. - - - This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 04:01, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:AlexRusso.jpg)[edit]

- Thanks for uploading Image:AlexRusso.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). - - If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Hannah Montana (Season 3)[edit]

- Sorry, I'll add them Back. I'm just trying to keep unofficial things,but I looked at the site, and it looks official. Please don't delete my page, becuase, I have things on my page that took awhile, and I need them. - Alec2011 (talk) 18:12, 14 September 2008 (UTC) - - : What do you mean by over-edits. It's fine, it's just that the Hannah Montana pages get vandalized a lot. Thanks, :D. - Alec2011 (talk) 21:35, 14 September 2008 (UTC) - - :: It's OK. Yeah, Those are more reliable than some other sites that are forums. I always delete the references with fourms as the refrences, because I don't think it's reliable, is that OK? Thanks, :D. - Alec2011 (talk) 22:50, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Re:Notability[edit]

- In the main The Simpsons article? No. If only they mentioned an episode, then it might be. -- Scorpion0422 02:02, 21 September 2008 (UTC)