User:RockMagnetist/Drafts/Genetics and the Origin of Species
This is not a Wikipedia article: It is an individual user's work-in-progress page, and may be incomplete and/or unreliable. For guidance on developing this draft, see Wikipedia:So you made a userspace draft. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Genetics and the Origin of Species is a 1937 book by the Ukrainian-American evolutionary biologist Theodosius Dobzhansky. It is regarded as one of the most important works of the modern evolutionary synthesis. The book popularized the work of population genetics to other biologists, and influenced their appreciation for the genetic basis of evolution.[1] In his book, Dobzhansky applied the theoretical work of Sewall Wright (1889-1988) to the study of natural populations, allowing him to address evolutionary problems in a novel way during his time.[2] The book explains evolution in depth as a process over time that accounts for the diversity of all life on Earth. The study of evolution was present, but greatly neglected at the time. Dobzhansky illustrates that evolution regarding the origin and nature of species during this time in history was deemed mysterious, but had expanding potential for progress to be made in its field.[3]
Background
[edit]- Darwin's theory lacked a mechanism for heredity
- Re-discovery of Mendelian genetics initially caused confusion and inspired the theory of mutationism
- Non-Darwinian theories thrived: Lamarckism, saltationism and orthogenesis.
Many biologists fell into two camps: population genetics, who mostly worked in the laboratory, and naturalists, who studied natural populations in the field and museums, and put much of their effort into taxonomy. The two groups used such different methods and terminology that it was difficult for them to communicate, but they were often battling over the same scarce academic resources, and each was often scornful of the other. As the paleontologist George Gaylord Simpson put it, paleontologists believed that "a geneticist was a person who shut himself in a room, pulled down the shades, watched small flies disporting themselves in milk bottles, and thought that he was studying nature." Meanwhile, geneticists were "like a man who undertakes to study the principles of the internal combustion engine by standing on a street corner and watching the motor cars whiz by."[4]
Publication
[edit]The book began as a series of lectures at Columbia University in October and November 1936. Dobzhansky decided to attend the summer 1936 meeting of the Genetics Society of America in Woods Hole, Massachusetts. When the geneticist Leslie Dunn learned of this, he invited Dobzhansky to give a series of lectures at Columbia. He sent the invitation in April, and within a month he had suggested that the lectures be a springboard for writing a general treatise on evolutionary genetics. Dobzhansky was enthusiastic, and in May he wrote back, proposing the title "Genetics and the Origin of Species". He envisioned two parts – "part I containing data on the sources of evolutionary change, and part II containing a discussion of their interactions leading to race- and species formation."[5] After the lectures (for which he received $500), Dobzhansky returned to Pasadena, and in December Columbia University Press accepted his proposal for a book. The pace of writing was helped by a riding accident in February 1937 in which he crushed his knee, and by April he was able to send a manuscript to Dunn for his perusal.[5]
While reading the manuscript, Dunn persuaded the university to revive the Jesup lectures, a series that had involved some notable lecturers in the past. It was back-dated so that Dobzhansky's lectures became the first in the series. The Columbia University Biological Series was also revived, and when Genetics and the Origin of Species was published in October 1937 it became the 11th volume in that series.[5]
Three main editions in 1937, 1941 and 1951 with significant changes.
Dobzhansky considered Genetics of the Evolutionary Process (1970) a fourth edition, but one so much changed that it needed a new title.[6]: 166 [7]
Content
[edit]Genetics and the Origin of Species has two main points to make. The first is that speciation is a genuine problem that must be explained by the theory of evolution. In nature, there is not a single population of organisms separated from each other by small variations. Instead, the natural world is divided into species, each with its own limited range of variability. The second point is that all the variations can be explained by the principles of genetics.[8]: xxvi–xxvii
The 1937 edition was divided into nine chapters, whose contents are described below.
Organic diversity
[edit]The first chapter is a short outline of the main points of the book: Evolutionary theory must account for variations on the level of the individual and also that of populations and species. It must explain how reproductive isolation can occur. And the goal is to explain all this using genetic principles that can be verified in the laboratory.[8]: xxix
Gene mutation
[edit]The second chapter argues that mutations occur frequently and random in direction. Most are small in effect, but they affect all features of organisms and vary from beneficial to lethal. They are sufficient to provide the raw material for natural selection.[8]: xxix
Mutation as a basis for racial and specific differences
[edit]In the third chapter, Dobzhansky demonstrates that the mutations that are observed in the laboratory also occur in nature, where they are acted on by natural selection. Thus, there is nothing intrinsically different about the process by which new species evolve.[8]: xxix–xxx
Chromosomal changes
[edit]Dobzhansky continues the theme of continuity between the laboratory and nature in chapter 4, showing that variations in the structure, arrangement and number of chromosomes occur in both the laboratory and nature. He shows that chromosomal translocation, a rearrangement of parts in chromosomes, accounts for racial differences in Datura stramonium (jimson-weed). Chromosomal inversion, a reversal of a segment, is the basis for differentiation in Drosophila. He also points out that these effects demonstrate that the chromosome parts are interdependent.[8]: xxx
Variation in natural populations
[edit]Having established that the sources of natural variation are mutations and chromosomal rearrangements, Dobzhansky considers what shapes and preserves this variation. In the first edition of this book, he considers genetic drift as important as natural selection. As an example, he argued that drift was the reason for racial variations that were observed in Partula, a land snail, so these variations had no adaptive advantage. He argued that most such variations, which he called microgeographic race, was nonadaptive. Because variation is not always controlled by selection, we need to know the size of a population before we can predict its evolutionary dynamics.[8]: xxxi
Selection
[edit]The sixth chapter discusses the evidence for natural selection from experiments in the laboratory and observations of nature. He considered examples of camouflage such as industrial melanism, in which moths and other arthropods evolve darker pigmentation when exposed to an environment with a lot of soot in it. He refuted some Mendelian misconceptions about the effectiveness of natural selection, but he also rejected the strict selectionism of Fisher.[8]: xxxi–xxxii
Polyploidy
[edit]In the seventh chapter, Dobzhansky discusses polyploidy, a condition (common in plants) where an organism has more than two complete sets of chromosomes.[9] (Humans are diploid, having one set each from the mother and father.) He discusses case histories such as that of Raphanobrassica, a hybrid between the radish and the cabbage. This is an example of "cataclysmic" speciation, an exception to his general rule that speciation is a slow process.[10]: 29
Isolating mechanisms
[edit]Hybrid sterility
[edit]Species as natural units
[edit]Experiments
[edit]Through his work on Drosophila pseudoobscura, a species of fruitfly, Dobzhansky was able to identify that some populations of this species did not have identical sets of genes. Dobzhansky used experimental breeding in laboratories and gardens, and also surveys related to species in nature to help support the aspects of organic evolution. The data in his book shows the different genetic mutations and chromosomal changes that were observed. All of the results from his experiments support the theory of modern evolutionary synthesis.
Mutations
[edit]Through his experiments, Dobzhansky discovers that mutations of genes lead to evolution within a specific species. The molecular basis for mutations is most importantly dependent on DNA. An organism's building instructions are encoded in the structure of the DNA molecule, and the inscribed DNA is inherited by future generations. Since DNA is consistently used as the hereditary material of life, mutations of DNA will directly affect the offspring, and eventually lead to evolution within that species. Adaptations play a large role in genetic drift, and it is known that genes and mutations influence this genetic drift in a particular environment. Mutations can result from external influences within the surrounding environment, especially if an organism inhabits an area with harsh living conditions. An organism can adapt to its environment in order to better suit its own needs. When an organism successfully adapts, it has higher survival and reproduction rate. Therefore, there is a higher chance its genes will be passed on to its offspring. Overtime, this becomes a genetic drift. Specific genes and alleles are then passed on to future generations to continue the trend of modern evolution that Dobzhansky presents in the book.[11]
Dobzhansky said natural mutation, aided by variation, can lead to change when acted upon by natural selection.[2] Mutations were thought to be relatively rare and other variations were even considered to be harmful. Since an organism's overall genetic make-up was the result of natural selection, with damaging mutations weeded out, wild populations were assumed to have very little mutations. As a result, evolution was said to be a relatively slow process. One of Dobzhansky's major contributions in this book was to show that this view of slow-moving evolution was incorrect. While analyzing chromosome structure in wild populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura, Dobzhansky discovered a surprising amount of undiscovered variability. These variations could not be observed in the outward appearance of the individual organisms. Dobzhansky suggested that preservation of extensive variation would allow populations to evolve rapidly as environmental conditions change. This book was an novel landmark in the evolutionary synthesis, as it presented the union of Mendelian genetics and Darwinian theory.[12]
In Genetics and the Origin of Species, polyploidy is considered as a type of mutation. Polyploid cells have a chromosome number that is more than twice the haploid number. The effects of polyploidy between two different species causes hybridization and even greater evolution.[3] These small chromosomal changes have large effects overall, and this emphasizes the importance of maintenance of species and populations.The focus of genetics then turned to the structural makeup of the gene. By mid-century this would revolutionize medicine as well as genetics. It would lead to manipulation of genes, gene therapies, identification of individuals by their DNA, replacement of defective genes, and identification and location of specific genes.[2]
Natural Selection and Speciation
[edit]Natural selection in an environment produces reproductive success, which benefits the species. Speciation is an process of evolution through which new biological species are formed. By studying the specifics of sexual, physiological, and behavioral isolating mechanisms in Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila paulistrorum, Dobzhansky showed that varying degrees of reproductive isolation represented speciation in the process. Like many of his other studies, Dobzhansky's work on reproductive isolation was aimed at studying the process of evolution in action.[12] Bringing samples from each population back into the laboratory, Dobzhansky showed that he could vary environmental conditions so as to produce the same changes in frequency of inversion patterns that were observed with changing seasons in the field. Dobzhansky concluded that such seasonal fluctuations were the result of natural selection at work, with temperature acting as the selecting agent. These masterful studies provided concrete support for the theory of natural selection, at the same time illustrating the fruitfulness of combining field and laboratory work in the study of evolution.[12] Adaptive evolution occurs through the dominance and survival of competing genes within a species. This is caused by increasing the frequency of those alleles whose phenotypic effects selfishly promote their own reproduction. Reproductive isolation slows gene flow and reduces the process of evolution. He also believed new species could not arise from single mutations and must be isolated from others of its species by time, geography, habitat, or breeding season.[2]
Overall Genetics and the Origin of Species shows the importance how genes, mutations, and chromosomal changes influence evolution. The idea of isolation is also described in his work and how it is important for the establishment and maintenance of species and populations in nature.
Historical Impact
[edit]Genetics and the Origin of Species provided the outline for a synthesis of genetics with evolution, and it was not long before the synthesis was broadened to include paleontology, systematics and botany in a series of notable books: Systematics and the Origin of Species (1942) by Ernst Mayr; Tempo and Mode in Evolution (1944) by George Gaylord Simpson; and Variation and Evolution in Plants (1950) by G. Ledyard Stebbins.[13] The emerging synthesis was called the evolutionary synthesis by Julian Huxley in his book, Evolution: The Modern Synthesis.[14]: 19 In 1947, a diverse collection of biologists met at a symposium in Princeton and declared their acceptance of this synthesis. However, it was not complete. Developmental biologists did not accept that the theory explained their observations, and for decades there was disagreement over whether the unit of selection was the gene or the individual as a whole.[15]
Awards
[edit]Dobzhansky was plagued by a form of leukemia in his later years, but he remained vigorously active until the day before his death on December 18, 1975.[12] During his lifetime he was the recipient of many honors and awards. For Genetics and the Origin of Species Dobzhansky was awarded the Daniel Giraud Elliot Medal from the National Academy of Sciences in 1941.[16] Sixty years after its publication, the National Academy of Sciences commissioned a book entitled Genetics and the Origin of Species: From Darwin to Molecular Biology 60 Years After Dobzhansky.[17]
It was also included in the 1990 edition of Great Books of the Western World, placing it with Charles Darwin's two great works The Origin of Species and the Descent of Man. A third edition was published in 1951.
References
[edit]- ^ Futuyma, Douglas J. (2005). Evolution (3rd print. ed.). Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates. ISBN 978-0878931873.
- ^ a b c d Ackert, Jr., Lloyd T. (2000). "Theodosius Grigor'evich Dobzhansky". In Schlager, Neil; Lauer, Josh (eds.). Science and Its Times : Understanding the Social Significance of Scientific Discovery. Vol. Volume 5: 1900–1949. Gale. pp. 160–161. ISBN 978-0787639327.
{{cite encyclopedia}}
:|volume=
has extra text (help) Cite error: The named reference "genetics" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). - ^ a b Dobzhansky, Theodosius (1982). Genetics and the origin of species (Reprint. ed.). New York: Columbia University Press. p. 8. ISBN 978-0231054751.
- ^ Ceccarelli, Leah (2001). Shaping science with rhetoric : the cases of Dobzhansky, Schrödinger, and Wilson. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press. pp. 13–60. ISBN 9780226099071.
- ^ a b c Cain, Joe (2002). "Co-opting colleagues: Appropriating Dobzhansky's 1936 lectures at Columbia". Journal of the History of Biology. 35: 207–219.
- ^ Ayala, Francisco J. (1985). "Theodosius Dobzhansky (1900–1975)" (PDF). Biographical memoirs. National Academy of Sciences. Retrieved 14 April 2014.
- ^ Dobzhansky, Theodosius (1970). Genetics of the evolutionary process (4th ed.). New York: Columbia university press. ISBN 978-0231083065.
- ^ a b c d e f g Gould, Stephen Jay (1982). "Introduction by Stephen Jay Gould". In Dobzhansky, Theodosius (ed.). Genetics and the origin of species (Reprint ed.). New York: Columbia University Press. pp. xvii–xxxix. ISBN 978-0231054751.
- ^ Woodhouse, Margaret (2009). "Polyploidy". Nature Education. 2 (1): 1.
{{cite journal}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Eldredge, Niles (1985). Unfinished Synthesis Biological Hierarchies and Modern Evolutionary Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, USA. ISBN 9780195365139.
- ^ Futuyma, D. J. Evolutionary Biology. Sunderland, Mass: Sinauer Associates, Inc., 1986. p. 9.
- ^ a b c d "Theodosius Dobzhansky". Encyclopedia of World Biography. Vol. 5. Gale. 1997. pp. 35–37.
- ^ Powell, Jeffrey R. (November 1987). ""In the Air" - Theodosius Dobzhansky's Genetics and the Origin of Species". Genetics. 117: 363–366.
{{cite journal}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help) - ^ Smokovitis, Vassiliki Betty (1996). Unifying biology : the evolutionary synthesis and evolutionary biology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. ISBN 9780691033433.
- ^ Mayr, Ernst; Provine, William B., eds. (1998). The Evolutionary synthesis : perspectives on the unification of biology (New ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. pp. xii–xiii. ISBN 9780674272262.
- ^ "Daniel Giraud Elliot Medal". National Academy of Sciences. Retrieved 16 February 2011.
- ^ Ayala, Francisco J.; Fitch, Walter M., eds. (1997). Genetics and the origin of species : from Darwin to molecular biology, 60 years after Dobzhansky. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences. ISBN 978-0309058773.
Further reading
[edit]Ayala, Francisco J. (22 July 1997). "Genetics and the origin of species: An introduction". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 94 (15): 7691–7697. Retrieved 13 April 2014. {{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help)
- Coyne, Jerry A. (18 August 1995). "Dobzhansky Revisited". Science. 269 (5226): 991–992. doi:10.1126/science.269.5226.991.
{{cite journal}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help);|chapter=
ignored (help) - Dobzhansky, Theodosius (2004). "The Present Evolution of Man". In Rose, Cynthia (ed.). American Decades Primary Sources. Vol. Volume 7: 1960–1969. Detroit: Gale. pp. 545–47. ISBN 978-0787665944.
{{cite encyclopedia}}
:|volume=
has extra text (help) - Lewontin, Richard C. (October 1997). "Dobzhansky's Genetics and the Origin of Species: Is it still relevant?". Genetics. 147: 351–355.
{{cite journal}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help) - Carson, Hampton L. (1998). "Cytogenetics and the Neo-Darwinian synthesis". In Mayr, Ernst; Provine, William B. (eds.). The Evolutionary synthesis : perspectives on the unification of biology (New ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. pp. 86–95. ISBN 9780674272262.
- Mayr, Ernst (1999). Systematics and the origin of species, from the viewpoint of a zoologist (1. Harvard Univ. Press pbk. ed.). Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Univ. Press. pp. xv–xvii. ISBN 9780674862500.
- Orr, H. Allen (December 1996). "Dobzhansky, Bateson and the genetics of speciation". Genetics. 144: 1331–1335.
{{cite journal}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help)