User:Riyaaarul/Water supply and sanitation in Nicaragua/Shreya.C123 Peer Review

Peer review

Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects:

Lead

Guiding questions:

Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content

Guiding questions:

Is the content added relevant to the topic?
Is the content added up-to-date?
Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

Is the content added neutral?
Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.)
Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
Are the sources current?
Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)
Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization

Guiding questions:

Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
Are images well-captioned?
Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only

If the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
What are the strengths of the content added?
How can the content added be improved?

Examples of good feedback

A good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.

Peer review of "Homemaking"
Peer review of this article about a famous painting

Additional Resources

Check out the Editing Wikipedia PDF for general editing tips and suggestions.

General info

Whose work are you reviewing?

@Riyaaarul Water supply and sanitation in Nicaragua

Link to draft you're reviewing
User:Riyaaarul/Water supply and sanitation in Nicaragua
Link to the current version of the article (if it exists): Water supply and sanitation in Nicaragua

Evaluate the drafted changes

Hi Riya - here's my peer review:

Overall, it's a great draft, but here are some suggestions on what could be added!

I feel that there could have been some inclusion of the lead section to help build the following section and give greater context.
When referring to the term "Modelo de Gestion Descontentrado", I think you could try to translate this from Spanish to English to help readers understand what this means.
You mention the "broader trends observed within several other regions of Latin America", but I feel like this could be the start of the new paragraph that leads into the next one instead of starting the next paragraph with "For instance,".
In your first sentence of the third paragraph which begins with "For instance", there are a few phrases and participles which make the sentence pretty lengthy - I think you could try to divide it up to make it easier to understand.
Also, in a few sentences there is a space before the period.
You mention the legacy of colonialism, but I think it would be good to expand on this or even turn it into another section since it is integral to understanding the reason behind water inequity in Latin America.
This inequity from colonialism has disproportionate impacts on present-day Indigenous societies within Latin America as well - this would be something else that might be important to include.
This is just an idea but in your last section, it might be relevant to incorporate the concept of "buen vivir" and other Indigenous-led water protection movements.
I think overall, your new sections are lacking citations, most of it is addressed as fact without citation, so including those would add credibility.
While I agree with you entirely about the impact of water distribution inequity, your tone in the new section could be more nuetral to fit into wikipedia's guidelines.

A lot of potential action is referred to in the last section, but maybe adding more detail to this would clarify exactly what you mean by these actionable steps.
The sentence on ETAP is not clear, so breaking this up and diving more into it would help in this.