Jump to content

User:Richwales/Tabs/Miscellaneous

This user helped get "Calvin's Case" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 21 May 2012.
This user helped get "George E. Crothers" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 11 August 2011.
This user helped get "Georgian numerals" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 14 February 2012.
This user helped get "Keturah" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 15 July 2015.
This user helped get "Nguyen v. INS" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 1 June 2012.
This user helped get "White Horse Prophecy" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 7 June 2010.
This user did a major rewrite of "BSAA Star Dust accident" become a good article on 28 September 2011.
This user helped "George E. Crothers" become a good article on 18 January 2013.
This user did a major rewrite of "Icelandic Naming Committee" become a good article on 27 June 2013.
This user did a major rewrite of "Kawakita v. United States" become a good article on 23 October 2015.
This user did a major rewrite of "Keturah" become a good article on 16 July 2015.
This user contributed significantly to "Minor v. Happersett" become a good article on 30 June 2012.
This user contributed significantly to "Steve Irwin" become a good article on 5 February 2011.
This user helped "Vance v. Terrazas" become a good article on 30 December 2010.
This user created and contributed significantly to "White Horse Prophecy" become a good article on 3 December 2011.
This user helped get Katyn massacre listed on the "In the News" section of the main page on 26 November 2010.
This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
This user did a major rewrite of "Afroyim v. Rusk", which became a Featured Article on 25 December 2012 and was Today's Featured Article on 20 February 2014
This user contributed significantly to "United States v. Wong Kim Ark", which became a Featured Article on 23 February 2012 and was Today's Featured Article on 19 October 2012
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

My current time is:    11:37, November 9, 2024 MST [refresh]

Click here to view my PGP public key — or download it here from the OpenPGP key server.

Committed identity: 98ff1499f50a4f54a908cf45fb26a145 670488c80b7b71f4428ffb4bab0e10ee d9da583e11201548825b5bb727249a3a 708f032ed8674d9a434f7c23232fa6ca is a SHA-512 commitment to this user's real-life identity.

Administrators are expected to lead by example and to behave in a respectful, civil manner in their interactions with others. Administrators are expected to follow Wikipedia policies and to perform their duties to the best of their abilities. Administrators should strive to model appropriate standards of courtesy and civility to other editors and to one another.

— from WP:ADMIN


Some pages I find useful



My thoughts on "anonymous" unregistered IP editing

I personally believe Wikipedia would be better off if all editors (or, at least, those who will be sticking around) consistently used accounts (except on very rare occasions). I have never heard a convincing reason why a serious Wikipedia editor would want to adopt an ongoing practice of editing "anonymously" with only an IP address (or dynamically changing IP addresses).

At the same time, I concede that my opinion on this issue is not policy, and probably never will be policy — and although I will sometimes urge frequent "anonymous" editors to register, I respect their right not to do so and to participate here using an IP address (or addresses) as long as they are not acting disruptively.

I will not hesitate, though, to impose "semi-protection" or "pending-changes protection" on an article that becomes mired in vandalism or edit warring involving multiple unregistered editors (or a single unregistered editor using a random bunch of dynamically assigned IP addresses). My motivation in such situations is not to disingenuously discriminate against IP editors — but if an article is under attack, then people's freedom to edit without using accounts may need to take a back seat to the more pressing imperative to protect Wikipedia — and in any event, no lasting harm is done in my opinion, since any legitimate editor can still participate in the editing of a semi-protected page by signing up for an account and going through the necessary steps to become autoconfirmed.