User:Premkudva/Archive8

April 2012

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one page into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to make a note in an edit summary at the source page as well. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:03, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Namaskar

WBRSin (talk) 04:25, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Mangalore International Airport

I have sorted out the talk page. For reference, another time please don't move a page by copying and pasting, because that loses the contribution history. If you can't move the page with the "move" tab because there is something already at the target page, an admin will have to do it: you can request it by putting {{db-move}} on the target page to ask for it to be deleted. Notice that if what is at the target page is a redirect, you need to put the db-move above the redirect, or it won't show. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 09:43, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks John, I had thought a cut and paste would have not have that history problem, and didn't want to bother an admin since both pages were relating to the same article. Will note this for any future movies.--PremKudva^Talk 09:50, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Template:Done

File permission problem with File:JonStock2008.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:JonStock2008.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 02:51, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

October 2012

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Indian rupee sign. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 05:59, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:JonStock2008.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:JonStock2008.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:06, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Calling edits vandalism

Please do not call good faith edits vandalism, as you did in this and this edit. Per WP:VANDAL, the word vandalism only refers to edits deliberately intended to make Wikipedia worse, like saying "The indian rupee sign looks dumb. Dumb stupid." You are correct that the info does not belong in the article, and I have reverted it's readdition, but it's certainly not vandalism. The person clearly does believe it's important, but we have to show him in our policies why it's not relevant for the article. Calling good faith edits vandalism can actually be considered a personal attack, so please be careful about the use of that word in the future. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:37, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:John Hambrock 200711.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:John Hambrock 200711.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 04:51, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:John MacLachlan Gray.png

Thanks for uploading File:John MacLachlan Gray.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 04:52, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

April 2013

Your addition to Calicut International Airport has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Abhishek ^Talk 07:26, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia Page:Kashi Math , Wrong Infromation

Hi Prem,

I'm a user from Mangalore, I need a help from you. We all know the Current Madathipathi & Pattashishya of Kashi math is Sundheendra Thirtha Swamiji & Samyamindra Thirtha Swamiji respectively. But a user named Granuator keeps on changing this. Spedian (talk) and myself are undoing all the changes done by him. If you know any admins please ask them to Lock the Page Kashi Math with fully Protected and block user Granuator.

Regards, Ajithrshenoy (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:21, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Kashi Math

Hi Prem, In Kashi Math all the added information are removed. Can you please Check, What is the exact issue??

Regards Spedian (talk) 19:10, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Kashi Math

Hi, Hi Prem, Can you please help me to Add atleast Basic details of Kashimath. I have added many Basic Sections with Reliable Source. But the Person Sitush, is Targeting on the Page, Reverting & Telling So much of Rules.

Can you please help me in What next I can do??

Regards Spedian (talk) 10:58, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Mangalore

I saw you have reverted my edit on Mangalore. May I know the reason?--Pavanaja (talk) 07:25, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

As per a previous discussion Malayalam and Beary Names, it has been decided that since Malayalam is not one of the official languages not include it.--PremKudva^Talk 09:19, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mars Orbiter Mission, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thrusters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

CCI Notice

Hello, Premkudva. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northwest Airlines Flight 188

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northwest Airlines Flight 188. seeking opinions on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Northwest Airlines Flight 188 Ochiwar (talk) 08:40, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

An apology

Hi Premkudva, it has been a long time. I believe we last bumped into each other in 2009. I was really rude to you and made several nasty comments about you back then. I believe I owe an apology for that. I realise I was a overly arrogant that time. I'm sorry. P.S: Check the talk page of MH370. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 14:17, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For Your Contibutions towards the ISRO and it's related articles Akshay Das XXX (talk) 01:30, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:The Brilliant Mind of Edison Lee.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:The Brilliant Mind of Edison Lee.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 12:18, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)