User:PaulGWiki/sandbox/ScratchPad

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Overall Comments[edit]

Within a period of 15 minutes you swing your scythe and remove 1/3rd of the article with no pre-discussion in the talk page and not justifiable comments (See below). I believe this is breaking the three revert rule. There was no discussion beforehand of these major edits contrary to WP:Edititing Policy Be_cautious_with_major_changes:_discuss

You then go on to edit other articles and coming back to the AIH article and perhaps speed read for about 5 minutes decide that the whole theory is a wingnut theory and not notable saying that in 50 years the only one who has written about this is Ling.

Addressing Notability[edit]

Notability can be expressed in the following questions and answers

Does the article contain reliable third-party sources?[edit]

Yes, the article contain 36 cites not written by Ling from reliable third-party sources. Of the 44 cites, 26 are from Ling. The criticism of Ling section is not complete but will add approx. 16 additional independent secondary source citations, so this will bring number of third party sources to approx 57% of all the cites.

However "No subject is automatically or inherently notable merely because it exists: The evidence must show the topic has gained significant independent coverage or recognition, and that this was not a mere short-term interest, nor a result of promotional activity or indiscriminate publicity, nor is the topic unsuitable for any other reason. Sources of evidence include recognized peer reviewed publications, credible and authoritative books, reputable media sources, and other reliable sources generally."

Does the AIH meet requirements to have significant independent coverage or recognition from reliable and recognized peer reviewed publicationsor credible and authoritative books?[edit]

Ling has over 120 articles in pubmed and has been published in a number of peer reviewed journals such as Journal of Cellular Physiology, The Journal of General Physiology, Nature, Science, Proc Natl Acad Sci and Biophysical Journal (See full list below).

Credible and authoritative books[edit]

A Google Search for the term "Association Induction Hypothesis" in google books between 1980 and present returns almost 100 separate credible and authoritative books. These include the following books :

  1. (2012) Living Rainbow H2O By Mae-Wan Ho[1]
  2. (2011) Science in Society 52 By Dr. Mae-Wan Ho, Prof. Peter Saunders, Dr. Eva Sirinathsinghji[2]
  3. (2010) Proceedings of the First Interdisciplinary CHESS Interactions Conference, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, 17-20 August 2009[3]
  4. (2009) Introduction to Bioregulatory Medicine[4]
  5. (2007) Water and the Cell edited by Gerald H. Pollack, Ivan L. Cameron, Denys N. Wheatle[5]
  6. (2005) Phase Transitions in Cell Biology edited by Gerald H. Pollack[6]
  7. (2005) Rhetoric and Incommensurability edited by Randy Allen Harris[7]
  8. (2006) Bioelectromagnetics Current Concepts: the mechanisms of the biological effect of extremely high power pulses edited by S. N. A?rapeti?a?n, Marko S. Markov[8]
  9. (1991) Phylogenetic and Biochemical Perspectives edited by T.P. Mommsen, Peter W. Hochachka[9]
  10. (1985) New Scientist April 1985 Article by Stephen Mason.[10]
  11. (1981) Tissues and Organs: Hierarchical and Functional Integration By G. A. Chauvet[11]
  12. (1980) Cooperative Phenomena in Biology edited by George Karreman[12]
  13. (1971) Chemistry of the Cell Interface, Part 2 edited by Harry Brown[13]

I contend that this satisfies this aspect of the notability guidelines.

List of papers submitted to Peer-Reviewed Journals[edit]

  1. Ling, G.N., Walton, C., and Ochsenfeld, M.M. (1981) J. Gen. Physiol, 106: 385
  2. Ling, G.N. (1980) J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 64: 1199.
  3. Ling, G. N. (1978) J. Physiol. (London) 280: 105.
  4. Ling, G.N. and Peterson, K. (1977) Bull. Math. Biol. 39: 721.
  5. Ling, G. N. (1977) Science 198: 1281.
  6. Ling, G. N. (1973) Biophys. J. 13: 807.
  7. Ling, G.N. and Ochsenfeld, M.M.(1973) Science 181: 78.
  8. Ling, G.N. and Bohr, G.(1970) Biophys. J. 10: 519.
  9. Ling, G. N. (1970) Inter. J. Neurosc. 1: 129.
  10. Ling, G.N. (1969) Science 163: 3335.
  11. Ling, G. N. (1969) Nature 221: 386.
  12. Ling, G.N., Ochsenfeld, M.M. and Karreman, G. (1967) J. Gen. Physiol. 50: 1807
  13. Ling, G. N. and Ochsenfeld M.M. (1966) J. Gen. Physiol. 49: 819.
  14. Ling, G.N. (1960) J. Gen. Physiol. 43: 149.
  15. Ling, G.N. and Gerard (1950) Nature 165: 133.
  16. Ling, G. N. and Woodbury, J. W. (1949) J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. 34: 407.
  17. Ling, G. N. and Gerard, R. W. (1949) J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. 34: 413.
  18. Ling, G.N. and Gerard, R. W. (1949) J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. 34: 388.
  19. Ling, G.N. and Gerard, R. W. (1949) J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. 34: 382.

List of Papers independent of Ling submitted to peer reviewed scientific Journals[edit]

  1. Tamagawa, H. and Nogata, F. (2004) J. Coll. Interfac. Sci. 275: 113.[14] [on the close-contact surface adsorption theory of resting and action potential of living cells.]
  2. Zheng, J. and Pollack, G. (2003) Phys. Rev. E68: 031408.[15] [on the polarized-oriented multilayer theory of cell water]
  3. Zglinicki, T. von (1988) Phyiol. Biophy. 7: 495.[16] [on K+ binding in muscle cells]
  4. Tigyi, J., Kallay, N., Tigyi-Sebes, A. and Trombitas, K. (1981) Intern. Cell Biol. (H.G. Schweiger, ed.) Springer, Berlin.[17] [ on selective ion adsorption in cells]
  5. Edelmann, L (1981) Fresnius Z. Anal-Chem 278-308.[18] [on localized ion adsorption in cells]
  6. Karreman, G. (1980) Cooperative Phenomena in Biology. Pergamon Press, New York.[19] [on cooperative adsorption in cells\
  7. Edelmann, L. (1980) Histochemistry 67: 233.[20] [on localized ion adsorption in cells]
  8. Trombitas, C. and Tigyi-Sebes, A. (1979) Acta Physiol. Acad. Sci. Hung. 14: 271.[21] [on selective ion adsorption in cells]
  9. Huang, H. W., Hunter, S.H., Warburton, W.K. and Moss, S.C. (1979) Science 204: 191.[22] [on selective adsorption of K+ in cells.]
  10. Edelman, L (1981)[23]
  11. Edelmann, L. (1977) J. Microscopy 12: 243.[24] [on selective ion adsorption in cells]
  12. Minkoff, L. and Damadian, R. (1973) Biophys. J. 13: 167.[25] [on cooperative K+ adsorption in cells]
  13. Edelmann, L., Pfleger, K. and Matt, K.H. (1971) Biophysics 7: 181.[26] [on resting potential of living cells]
  14. Edelmann, L. and Baldauf, J.H. (1971) First Eur. Biophys. Congress, Baden.[27] [on resting potential of living cells]
  15. Jones, A.W. (1965) Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Pennsylvania. PA. [on cooperative K+ adsorption in cells]
  16. Hollis, D., Saryan, L.A. and Morris, H. P., Johns Hopkins Medical Journal 121:441.[28] [on cell water]
  17. Raymond, D., (1971) 171: 1151.[29] [on cell water]
  18. Hazelwood, C.F., Nichols, B.L.and Chamberlain, N.F. (1969) Nature 222:747.[30] [on cell water]
  19. Cope, F.W. (1969) Biophys. J. 9:303.[31] [on cell water]

So, the contention appears to be that the Association Induction Hypothesis has not received sufficient attention from mainstream science which includes the peer-review process and this disbars it from having an entry in wiki. If this is the case then the entry on Einstein should be revised because only 1 of his 300 published papers was peer reviewed.[32] Examples of papers that were rejected by peer reviewers and journals but later became some of the most important scientific papers of recent years include the Krebs article on the citric acid cycle, possibly the most important single article in modern biochemistry, was initially rejected by the peer review process.[33] The work of S. A. Berson, MD, and Yalow on radioimmunoassay, which, like Krebs' studies, eventually led to a Nobel Prize, was initially rejected for publication.[34]

Reverts I disagree with[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Association_induction_hypothesis&diff=630099519&oldid=630099398[edit]

Comments: Addition of {{Primary]] "Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published secondary sources.."

Of the 44 cites, 26 are from Ling. The criticism of Ling section is not complete but will add approx. 16 additional independent secondary source citations, so this will bring number of secondary sources to approx 57% of all the cites

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Association_induction_hypothesis&diff=630104190&oldid=630102607[edit]

Comment: You revert the whole article (Some 62,000 bytes or 24 pages) to a redirect back to Gilbert Lings wiki page with the comment "non notable wingnut theory , in 50 years the only one who has written about this is ling, redirect to author"

This article was started by me in April 2014 and it is now Oct 2014 and represent many hours of research). I do not even know what is meant by a wingnut theory. Can you please provide evidence or cites for your opinion that this theory is not notable. Are you for example a biochemist? or scientist? What qualifies you for this opinion or what did you read to come to this conclusion? Please enlighten me as you have made no attempt to engage with me either my User talk page or the articles Talk page. If you had you would have seen a list of 18 cites from independent third-party reliable and verifiable scientists in the field. This is in addition to the 34 third party cites already in the article.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Association_induction_hypothesis&diff=630098281&oldid=630098235[edit]

Comment: In this revision the list of published books by Ling are removed. This makes absolutely no sense, the WIKI article is about his Association Induction Hypothesis which is what all of his published books are about. I don't see the need to withhold this information. As a precedent in the Newtons Laws Of Motion page there is a section Further Reading And Works Cited where Newton's publications are listed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Association_induction_hypothesis&diff=630098493&oldid=630098281

Comment: In this revision the term Scientific Theory is replaced with the term ‘proposal’.

This is not a truthful and accurate word to describe Ling’s 50 years career as a professional scientist using the scientific method to test and falsify his theory. According to the Wiki entry for Scientific Theory

A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is acquired through the scientific method and repeatedly tested and confirmed through observation and experimentation.[35][36] As with most (if not all) forms of scientific knowledge, scientific theories are inductive in nature and aim for predictive power and explanatory force.[37][38]

The strength of a scientific theory is related to the diversity of phenomena it can explain, and to its elegance and simplicity (Occam's razor).[citation needed] As additional scientific evidence is gathered, a scientific theory may be rejected or modified if it does not fit the new empirical findings- in such circumstances, a more accurate theory is then desired. In certain cases, the less-accurate unmodified scientific theory can still be treated as a theory if it is useful (due to its sheer simplicity) as an approximation under specific conditions (e.g. Newton's laws of motion as an approximation to special relativity at velocities which are small relative to the speed of light).[citation needed]

Scientific theories are testable and make falsifiable predictions.[citation needed] They describe the causal elements responsible for a particular natural phenomenon, and are used to explain and predict aspects of the physical universe or specific areas of inquiry (e.g. electricity, chemistry, astronomy). Scientists use theories as a foundation to gain further scientific knowledge, as well as to accomplish goals such as inventing technology or curing disease. Scientific theories are the most reliable, rigorous, and comprehensive form of scientific knowledge.[37] This is significantly different from the common usage of the word "theory", which implies that something is a conjecture, hypothesis, or guess (i.e., unsubstantiated and speculative).[39]

Ling’s theory meets these criteria in my opinion, for example in the Ling wiki page Damadian who arguably invented MRI credits Ling’s theory as being responsible for the technology with the words

“I studied the proton resonance emissions from cell water. Recent NMR work of Cope (2), Hazlewood et al (3), and Bratton et al (4) has provided fresh insight into the physical nature of cell water. These authors have independently concluded that the decreased NMR relaxation times observed for cell water relative to distilled water (Tables 1 and 2) are due to the existence of a highly ordered fraction of cell water in which the protons of the water molecules have correlation times substantially less than the Larmor period. The reduction of the correlation times is presumably due to the adsorption of water molecules at macromolecular interfaces, findings that are consistent with the proposal by Ling (5) that intracellular water (endosolvent) exists as multiple polarized layers adsorbed onto cell proteins....The results suggest that this technique may prove useful in the detection of malignant tumors.”[39]

On Nov 9 1977 Dr. Damadian wrote a letter to Gilbert Ling describing the moment when the first MRI image of human body was obtained “On the morning of July 3 at 4:45 A.M….we achieved with great jubilation the world’s first MRI image of the live human body. The achievement originated in the modern concepts of salt water biophysics, on which you are the grand pioneer with your classic treatise, the association-induction hypothesis.”

I do not agree with the removal of the terms theory of the cell created by Gilbert Ling, a cell physiologist and biochemist. This gives an appropriate initial context to the article e.g. it is about a theory of the cell (there are others and a history hence the link) by someone who is a verifiably a cell physiologist and biochemist, that is a professional scientist not just some layperson. You seem intent on denying or minimizing these facts for some unknown reason, your comment “appropriate maybe for ling's page, but not here” does not fit the proposed changes

I agree with removal of the phrase AIH is a unifying theory of life that has the potential to explain all life phenomena on the basis of the properties and

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Association_induction_hypothesis&diff=630098572&oldid=630098493[edit]

Comments: Removal of the section Overview of the Theory with the comment “not a reliably published source, not a how to”.

Ling’s theory is complicated so I think a summary or overview is warranted for those who don’t want to get into more detail. This section has been approved by Gilbert Ling himself as being accurate but I cannot cite an email, so what should be done??

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Association_induction_hypothesis&diff=630098611&oldid=630098572[edit]

Comments: Removal of the section Beginning of the Theory.

This short section sets the historical stage of how in 1947 Gilbert Ling failed to find evidence for the membrane (pump) theory and thus spent his whole life finding and documenting evidence against the mainstream view. His AIH theory is diametrically opposed to the mainstream view and removing mention of this would make the article extremely biased and unbalanced. Neutral Point of View says that the article should fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by a verifiable source

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Association_induction_hypothesis&diff=630098887&oldid=630098611[edit]

Comments: Removal of the section Evidence Against the Membrane Pump Theory.

I disagree with the section being characterized as being irrelevant or a tangential subject as described by Coatrack. The article is about Ling's AIH theory and an essential part of that theory is an attempt to disproof the prevailing membrane theory. e.g. Ling following the scientific method to disproof an hypothesis. All his books and papers have sections on the experiments he claims as evidence against membrane pump theory. Nobody in the right mind would take him seriously as a scientist or his theory seriously if he did not have experiments that attempt to 'prove the inadequacies of the prevailing membrane pump theory. This to me would be like the Spherical Earth wiki page having no mention of the Flat Earth theory. Removing this section severely blinds the reader to why indeed there is an alternative theory in the first place and its credibility is severely diminished and I don't understand the reasons for removing it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Association_induction_hypothesis&diff=630099249&oldid=630098887[edit]

Comments: Removal of modern day cites (2000 onwards)[40] in particular through the work of Gerald Pollack.(2001, 2013)[41][42][43] and Martin Chaplin[44][45] on structured water and in the works of Mae Wan Ho[46][47] and Vladimir Matveev.[48][49][50] that purport to support the AIH Theory with the comment "no indication any of these are about the subject of this article" SYN.

As has been clearly stated in the article a key aspect of the AIH theory is polarized-oriented multilayer theory of cell water. All the cites listed specifically mention Ling in relation to this theory of water so this is not an attempt to combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources. It is directly relevant, for example in this cite are the words "In recent years three types of observations have given strong support to the PM theory".

Furthermore, Ling is often characterized as being a relic of the 50s, 60s and 70s and not having any supporters since then, indeed your final revert which is to shut down this article and redirect to Ling's page says as such as shows your ignorance on the matter.."Non notable wingnut theory, in 50 years the only one who has written about this is ling". This is factually inaccurate. Pollack dedicated his Fourth Phase of Water book to Gilbert Ling and mentions him a number of times, Mae Wan Ho has a number of chapters in her book that refer to Ling. There is strong support for Ling in the Laboratory of Cell Physiology, Institute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences as evidenced by the papers by Matveev. These are the cites that you deem not about this subject whereas the opposite is true.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Association_induction_hypothesis&diff=630099398&oldid=630099249[edit]

Comments: Removal of a cite from 1936 with the comment "publications from 36 are clearly NOT discussing a claim first articlulated in 61". Did you read the full sentence which says "Initially Ling in 1965 based his polarized multilayer (PM) theory on the earlier theories of deBoer and Zwikker (1929) and Bradley (1936)

  1. ^ Ho, Mae Wan (August 21 2012). Living Rainbow H2O (1st ed.). World Scientific Publishing Company. pp. 263–280. ISBN 9814390895. {{cite book}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  2. ^ Ho, Mae-Wan; Saunders, Peter; Sirinathsinghji, Eva (14 Nov 2011). Institute of Science in Society. 52 http://books.google.com.au/books?id=BUJeAQAAQBAJ&pg=PA24&dq=%22Association+Induction+Hypothesis%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=rCxHVJvwLYvY8gX4koCAAQ&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22Association%20Induction%20Hypothesis%22&f=false. {{cite journal}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  3. ^ Haven, editors, Chary Rangacharyulu, Emmanuel (2010). Proceedings of the First Interdisciplinary CHESS Interactions Conference, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, 17-20 August 2009. Singapore: World Scientific. pp. 300–302. ISBN 9814295884. {{cite book}}: |first1= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  4. ^ O'Byrne er al, Arturo (2009). Introduction to bioregulatory medicine. Stuttgart: Thieme. pp. 134–136. ISBN 3131476117.
  5. ^ Wheatley, edited by Gerald H. Pollack, Ivan L. Cameron, Denys N. (2006). Water and the cell. Dordrecht: Springer. ISBN 1402049277. {{cite book}}: |first1= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  6. ^ editors, Gerald H. Pollack, Wei-Chun Chin, (2008). Phase transitions in cell biology. [Dordrecht]: Springer. pp. 145–146. ISBN 1402086512. {{cite book}}: |last1= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  7. ^ ed.; Harris, introduced by Randy Allen (2005). Rhetoric and incommensurability. West Lafayette, Ind.: Parlor Press. pp. 393–423. ISBN 1932559515. {{cite book}}: |last1= has generic name (help)
  8. ^ Ayrapetyan, edited by Sinerik N.; Markov, Marko S. (2006). Bioelectromagnetics current concepts : the mechanisms of the biological effect of extremely high power pulses. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 231–237. ISBN 1402042787. Retrieved 21 October 2014. {{cite book}}: |first1= has generic name (help)
  9. ^ Hochachka, edited by P.W.; Mommsen, T.P. (1991). Phylogenetic and Biochemical Perspectives. Oxford: Elsevier Science. pp. 12–13. ISBN 0080934285. {{cite book}}: |first1= has generic name (help)
  10. ^ Mason, Stephen. "A Lifelong Quest". NewScientist. Retrieved 21 October 2014.
  11. ^ Chauvet, G. A. (December 31, 1981). Tissues and Organs: Hierarchical and Functional Integration (Volume 2). Pergamon (December 31, 1981). pp. 44–51. ISBN 978-1483106465.
  12. ^ Karreman, George (January 1, 1980). Cooperative Phenomena in Biology. Pergamon (January 1, 1980). pp. 39–70. ISBN 1483116255.
  13. ^ Brown, edited by Harry Darrow (1971). Chemistry of the cell interface. New York: Academic Press. pp. 12, 37–38, 112. ISBN 032315526X. Retrieved 21 October 2014. {{cite book}}: |first1= has generic name (help)
  14. ^ Tamagawa, H; Nogata, F (1 Jul 2004). "Extension of Colacicco's experiment supporting the adsorption theory". Journal of colloid and interface science. 275 (1): 113–22. PMID 15158388.
  15. ^ Zheng, JM; Pollack, GH (Sep 2003). "Long-range forces extending from polymer-gel surfaces" (PDF). Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics. 68 (3 Pt 1): 031408. PMID 14524770.
  16. ^ von Zglinicki, T (Oct 1988). "Monovalent ions are spatially bound within the sarcomere". General physiology and biophysics. 7 (5): 495–503. PMID 3234738.
  17. ^ Tigyi, J.; Kallay, N.; Tigyi-Sebes, A.; Trombitás, K. (1981). "Distribution and Function of Water and Ions in Resting and Contracted Muscle". International Cell Biology: 925–940. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-67916-2_104.
  18. ^ Edelmann, L. (1981). "Selective Accumulation of Li +, Na +, K +, Rb +, and Cs ÷ at Protein Sites of Freeze-Dried Embedded Muscle Detected by LAMMA" (PDF). Fresenius' Zeitschrift für analytische Chemie. 308 (3): 218–220.
  19. ^ Karreman, ed. by George (1980). Cooperative phenomena in biology. New York [u.a.]: Pergamon Pr. ISBN 0-08-023186-1. {{cite book}}: |first1= has generic name (help)
  20. ^ Edelmann, L (1980). "Potassium binding sites in muscle: electron microscopic visualization of K, Rb, and Cs in freeze-dried preparations and autoradiography at liquid nitrogen temperature using 86Rb and 134Cs". Histochemistry. 67 (3): 233–42. PMID 6967478.
  21. ^ Trombitás, K; Tigyi-Sebes, A (1979). "X-ray microanalytical studies on native myofibrils and mitochondria isolated by microdissection from honey-bee flight muscle". Acta biochimica et biophysica; Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae. 14 (4): 271–7. PMID 553443.
  22. ^ Huang, HW; Hunter, SH; Warburton, WK; Moss, SC (13 Apr 1979). "X-ray absorption edge fine structure of potassium ions in various environments: application to frog blood cells". Science (New York, N.Y.). 204 (4389): 191–3. PMID 311948.
  23. ^ Edelman, L. (1981). "Electron Microscopic Demonstration of Potassium Binding Sites in Muscle". International Cell Biology: 941–948.
  24. ^ Edelmann, L (1977). "Potassium adsorption sites in frog muscle visualized by cesium and thallium under the transmission electron microscope". Physiological chemistry and physics. 9 (4–5): 313–7. PMID 613329.
  25. ^ Minkoff, L; Damadian, R (Feb 1973). "Caloric catastrophe". Biophysical journal. 13 (2): 167–78. PMID 4573826.
  26. ^ Edelmann, L; Pfleger, K; Matt, KH (1971). "[Preferential accumulation of cesium 137 in the mammalian organism, in comparison with potassium accumulation. I. Accumulation of potassium, rubidium and cesium in the perfused guinea pig heart]". Biophysik. 7 (3): 181–99. PMID 5088804.
  27. ^ Edelmann, L; Edelmann, H; Baldauf, JH (1974). "Rapid exchange of cellular K+, Rb+, and Cs+ and its relation to the resting potential of guinea pig papillary muscle cells". Physiological chemistry and physics. 6 (5): 429–44. PMID 4449897.
  28. ^ Hollis, DP; Saryan, LA; Morris, HP (Dec 1972). "A nuclear magnetic resonance study of water in two Morris hepatomas" (PDF). The Johns Hopkins medical journal. 131 (6): 441–4. PMID 4344259.
  29. ^ Damadian, R (19 Mar 1971). "Tumor detection by nuclear magnetic resonance" (PDF). Science (New York, N.Y.). 171 (3976): 1151–3. PMID 5544870.
  30. ^ HAZLEWOOD, C. F.; NICHOLS, B. L.; CHAMBERLAIN, N. F. (24 May 1969). "Evidence for the Existence of a Minimum of Two Phases of Ordered Water in Skeletal Muscle" (PDF). Nature. 222 (5195): 747–750. doi:10.1038/222747a0.
  31. ^ Cope, FW (Mar 1969). "Nuclear magnetic resonance evidence using D2O for structured water in muscle and brain". Biophysical journal. 9 (3): 303–19. PMID 5780710.
  32. ^ Nielsen, Michael. "Three myths about scientific peer review".
  33. ^ Borrel, Brendan. "Nature rejects Krebs's paper, 1937". http://www.the-scientist.com/. TheScientist. {{cite web}}: External link in |website= (help)
  34. ^ Kahn, C. Ronald; Roth, Jesse (15 October 2004). "Berson, Yalow, and the JCI: the agony and the ecstasy". Journal of Clinical Investigation. 114 (8): 1051–1054. doi:10.1172/JCI23316.
  35. ^ National Academy of Sciences, 1999
  36. ^ AAAS Evolution Resources
  37. ^ a b Schafersman, Steven D. "An Introduction to Science".
  38. ^ American Association for the Advancement of Science, Project 2061
  39. ^ National Academy of Sciences, 2008.
  40. ^ CARVAJAL-RONDANELLI, PATRICIO ARMANDO. "Diffusion of protease inhibitors in the muscle cell" (PDF). pp. 62–71. Retrieved July 14, 2014.
  41. ^ Das, Ronnie; Pollack, Gerald H. (February 26, 2013). "Charge-Based Forces at the Nafion–Water Interface". Langmuir. 29 (8): 2651–2658. doi:10.1021/la304418p.
  42. ^ Pollack, Gerald H. (2001). Cells, gels and the engines of life : a new, unifying approach to cell function. Seattle: Ebner & Sons. ISBN 0962689521.
  43. ^ Pollack, Gerald H. (2013). The fourth phase of water : beyond solid, liquid, and vapor. Seattle: Ebner and Sons. ISBN 0962689548.
  44. ^ Chaplin, Martin (2004). "The Importance of Cell Water". Institute of Science in Society.
  45. ^ Daviss, Bennett (2004). "Structured Water Is Changing Models". The Scientist. 18 (21): 4.
  46. ^ Ho, Mae-Wan (2008). The rainbow and the worm : the physics of organisms (3rd ed. ed.). Singapore: World Scientific. ISBN 9812832602. {{cite book}}: |edition= has extra text (help)
  47. ^ Ho, Mae-Wan (2012). Living rainbow H₂O. Singapore: World Scientific. ISBN 9814390895.
  48. ^ Laurent Jaeken and Vladimir Matveev (Sep 2012). "Coherent Behavior and the Bound State of Water and K+ Imply Another Model of Bioenergetics: Negative Entropy Instead of High-energy Bonds" (PDF). The Open Biochemistry Journal. 6: 139–159. doi:10.2174/1874091X01206010139. PMC 3527877. PMID 23264833.
  49. ^ Matveev, VV (Jun 2010). "Native aggregation as a cause of origin of temporary cellular structures needed for all forms of cellular activity, signaling and transformations". Theoretical biology & medical modelling. 7: 19. doi:10.1186/1742-4682-7-19. PMID 20534114.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  50. ^ Matveev, Vladamir V (2011). "The Significance of Non-ergodic Property of Statistical Mechanics Systems for Understanding Resting State of a Living Cell" (PDF). British Journal of Mathematics & Computer Science. 1(2): 46–86.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:PaulGWiki/sandbox/ScratchPad&oldid=630890210"