User:Moreschi/Bharatveer

Bakasuprman

Continued pattern of pro-Hindu POV-pushing, edit-warring, incivility, and personal attacks. Why we have not banned this editor yet, I don't know.

• [1]
• [2] = Economist not deemed a suitable source.
• [3] - page history
• [4]
• [5] removes the same material yet again after someone had put it back in.
• [6] - flat reverting, no reason given.
• [7] - this was just plain hilarious: category gets deleted at CFD, Cydebot removes it from the articles it was in. Bakasuprman thinks its a good idea to start revert-warring with the bot, makes about 15 of these reverts. Fortunately the bot just reverts straight back! No prizes for guessing what the category was: Category:Hindu politicians.
• Reverting in tandem with User:Hkelkar, this one is quite a leitmotif. We'll see it again later.
• Count the personal attacks
• Keep on counting
• [8]
• Flat reverting
• [9]
• [10]
• [11] - POV edit-warring.
• [12] epic edit-warring to Michael Witzel. Read the article, it's not hard to work out why. Same for David Frawley. Selected diffs...
• [13] Reverts for Hkelkar.
• Good enough sources for a BLP? I don't really think so.
• [14]
• [15]
• [16]
• [17]
• [18]
• [19] - my point exactly.
• [20]
• [21] edit-warring continues right up until October, any old op-ed will surely do as a source, right?
• [22] - charming! Worth noting here that User:Hornplease is most definitely not banned, nor editing at the moment, nor had Bakasuprman's block log.
• revert to Hkelkar
• Flat reverting
• [23] history of Goa Inquisition, I'm not going to list all the reverts, people can see for themselves.
• [24] personal attacks on the Wikiquette alerts page...one rather does have to chuckle at the irony.
• Ok...
• Oh, no, the rules don't apply to me, I edit India-related articles...(admin only).
• Why not prove the point while we're at it?...(admin only).
• and again.
• [25]
• Don't we just love automatic reversion tools?