Jump to content

User:Michsm/draftingbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Working Parent article

Sources:

1. Marriages, Families, & Intimate Relationships textbook; Williams, B., Wahlstrom, C., and Sawyer, S.C. (2016). Marriages, Families & Intimate Relationships.

Pearson.

2. Gender by Wade, Wade, L., and Ferree, M. M. (2015). Gender: Ideas, Interactions, Institutions. New York, NY. W.W. Norton & Co.

3. Killing the Black Body by Roberts, Roberts, D. (2017). Killing the Black Body: Race, Reproduction, and the Meaning of Liberty. New York. Vintage Books.

4. A Different Mirror by Takaki, Takaki, R. (). A Different Mirror.

5. database film Our Families, Our Future directed by Roger Weisberg; produced by Roger Weisberg, Public Policy Productions (New York, NY:Filmakers Library, 1994), 1 hour 22 mins

6. database film The Modern Family: Finding Balance produced by Bloomberg; interview by Pimm Fox, 1960- (New York, NY: Bloomberg, 2013), 6 mins

gov welfare websites, films, scholarly articles

Include both sides of bias in mommy wars?, make sure to balance out the amount of article moms get v dads. Include info comparing the US working model and other countries?

breastfeeding, non-het-norm fams

Abstract: add to this section, elaborate on what constitutes a working parent i.e. a parent who might work from home, or out of the home as a business?

"This income is typically seen as sourced from outside the home, but it can include income earned from home-based businesses, both of which require working parents to devote time to making a living" ???

Abstract

A working parent is a father or a mother who engages in a work life, aside from their duties as a childcare provider, and home maker. There are many structures within families including single, working mothers or single, working fathers. There are also married parents who are dual-earners, in which both parents provide income to support their family or their own needs. These family structures sometimes raise much concern about gender inequalities. Within the institution of gender, there are expected gender roles that society pins on both mothers and fathers that are reflected by events and expectations in the home and at work.

A working parent is a father or a mother who engages in a work life. Contrary to the popular belief that work equates to efforts aside from parents' duties as a childcare provider and home maker, it is thought that housewives or househusbands count as working parents (Wade). The variations of family structures include, but are not limited to, married couples where the father is the breadwinner and the mother keeps her duties focused within the home, single working mothers, and single working fathers. Throughout the 20th century, family work structures experiences significant changes. This was shown by the range of work opportunities each parent was able to to take and was expected to do, to fluctuations in wages, benefits, and time available to spend with children (MF&IR). There are married parents who are dual-earners, in which both parents provide income to support their individual and family needs. These family structures sometimes raise a great deal of concern regarding gender inequalities. Within the institutional construction of gender, there are defined gender roles that society expects of both mothers and fathers, which are reflected by events and expectations in the home and at work.

Historic: who can be an accepted mother, who was barred from motherhood - welfare moms/queens.

Historic Views

*The concept of working parents has existed for centuries, especially during slavery in the United States. Female and male slaves were expected to bear children for white slave masters, yet were not always allowed to parent these children. In some ways, these mothers and fathers were providing income for the offspring they produced, but in the way society thinks of traditional family structures, slaves were only sometimes allowed to be true working parents, earning a modified sort of income to support their family (Roberts).

*For initially non-white immigrants who came to America during the 1700's through the 1900's, the traditional roles of many mothers and fathers were ignored, as both were required to take the role of working parents in order to survive. For Chinese immigrants, fathers and mothers ran laundry-houses, and Irish parents worked in hard-labor factories. This situation changed for mothers to take on the housewife role as immigrants from Europe and Asia earned whiteness (Takaki).

*Television in the 1950’s and 1960’s gave people a one track structure of how families should function. Men went to work to earn money to pay bills and to support his family, and women were expected to stay home as housewives and child care givers (Our Families, Our Future). The gender inequalities that are reflective of this idealized family structure result from the beliefs that women are less capable of separating from the children they are predisposed to bear (Wade). Additionally, it is still believed by most people that parents who stay at home with no formal outside job are not doing any work, when in fact, these parents put in more hours of work than their counterparts, shown by statistics documenting the second shift (Wade).

*The ideas about who should and can be a parent have also shifted over time, with a more inclusive range of family structures becoming recognized. During the 20th century, dual-earner families, single-mother and single-father families, adoptive families, grandparents as primary guardians, LGBTQ+ parent families, and more emerged (MF&IR). With the changing sphere of family makeup came a change in who society accepted as parents, an effort mostly directed at limiting black mothers from reproducing if they could not or would not work. These women were known as welfare queens, whom society believed to have children solely for the government to write them checks (Roberts). Changing ideas about family and changes in the job economy brought new risks for mothers (Wade).

*Through the latter half of the 20th century, women were discriminated against by employers who believed that women's fertility put them in danger to certain working environments, barring them from performing certain tasks or holding certain positions with pregnancy bans (Roberts) (Wade). If parents, particularly mothers, worked, especially in time-demanding jobs, the time they could spend with their child or children was limited, and received criticism. However, if a woman was a stay-at-home mom, they were seen as doing nothing, and therefore devalued (MF&IR). This belief is combated by the increasing amount of documentation that both men and women who stay at home perform more household work than their partners (Wade).

slaves being birth parents but not always being allowed to parent. Immigrants m/f working to support family. Gendered inequalities in the belief of who should work and who should not.

MpFb: mom's earn less, they do not receive much maternity leave, and are often punished for carrying a pregnancy in matters of being fired (with cover up as unrelated to the pregnancy), being given less hours. Fathers typically receive an increase in pay and bonuses, more hours to work, better benefits.

MpFb

Although women may be easier to employ than men are due to their salary demands (existing citation), women also face a challenge of defending their rights as mothers in a working environment (existing citation).Men have the potential of earning high regards for being a working father. Hegemonic masculinity plays a role in determining a man’s bonus. If he is white, middle class and has a stable home life with a wife and children, he is viewed as the most appropriately masculine man available to earn a raise (existing citation). As such, more fathers are also offered paid paternity leave.

Motherhood and fatherhood seem to exist in opposition to each other in regards to work lives. The motherhood penalty or "mommy tax", is one that hurts women's financial opportunities, especially in making poverty a majorly feminine status whereas success is masculinized (Wade). The assumption that women will or do have children carries discrimination that says moms are the ones who will step away from their jobs to boost their children's development. Although women may be easier to employ than men are due to the hold on their salary demands, women face a challenge of defending their rights as mothers in a working environment^. Strictly policed career pushing to send men and women into different fields, as well as the gender pay gap highlight the discrimination that women face in the work force. Policies meant to protect the fertility and reproductive capabilities of women intact were enacted, barring them from working too hard while also barring them from building too successful of a career. These hurdles, among others, present women and mothers with possibilities in their career while simultaneously putting permanent barriers preventing them from succeeding, a concept known as the glass ceiling (Wade). Men have the potential of earning high regards for being a working father. Hegemonic masculinity plays a role in determining a man’s financial and status bonus in his place of work. If he is white, middle class, and has a stable home life with a wife and children, he is viewed as the most appropriate man available to earn a raise^. Traditional work for men surrounds employment in area that highlight a father as being able to provide as the sole earner in a family (MF&IR). As such, more fathers are also offered paid paternity leave. Some companies are making it possible to begin ending the motherhood penalty. Gay Gaddis, company owner of T3, implemented a system where new parents could bring their child to work during the critical stages of child-parent bonding, as she likes to run her business by focusing on keeping employees happy and clients trusting, while still bringing in profits (The Modern Family).

Working Moms: feminism, the mommy track, The Second Shift for moms vs beer can and football/tv dads MF&IR - the glass ceiling, or split into two tracks where a mom can either be a career woman or a mom with a career, the difference between the two being the dedication to either work or family. make some minor corrections to grammar in some sections

Although mothers have flourished in paid labor environments, they still face gender inequalities that affect their ability to maintain a healthy home-work life. The added pressures of working mothers rests on the stereotypical, gendered assumptions that women are the prime care takers of children, which is a fact that is often reflected in privileges and advantages in the work place between men and women. One disadvantage that the working mothers face is a wage gap, sometimes referred to as a "motherhood penalty". Women often experience working a "double day" or "second shift" when they go to a wage-earning job and then come home. When women are hired, they are assumed to have more home life responsibilities that can interfere with their ability to do well at work. Relating to their male counterparts, if women want to provide more for their family, they are to take on the masculine work ethic. That is, be more aggressive, and put work before your family. An increase in work demands may alleviate the burden of economic decreases; however, this takes away the time needed to raise a family. With 66% of married women in a dual-income family, that percentage illustrates that, although both parents are economic providers for their family, the women take on both work and family responsibilities due to society’s gender roles. Research shows that, consistent with utility maximization theory, women are not merely opting out of the workforce, but rather are accurately assessing the potential opportunity and direct labor market costs of their exit decisions, and are making workforce exit decisions based on measurable costs and benefits.

[1]

The involvement of women in paid work varies and had varied by historical period, geographical region and social class. From the late 19th century to the 1970s, married women in some Western countries were restricted from working outside the home through marriage bars. For instance, in the Netherlands, the marriage bar was removed in 1957, and in Ireland it was removed in 1973. In some European countries, married women could not work without the consent of their husbands until just a few decades ago, for example, in France until 1965 and in Spain until 1975. After second wave of feminism made it possible for more women to be present in the work place, many mothers took advantage; according to the U.S. Department of Labor, the increase of mothers in the workforce, with children under the age of 18, has risen to 70.6% in 2011. Mothers with younger children are less likely to work than those with older children.

Although mothers have flourished in paid labor environments, they still face gender inequalities that affect their ability to maintain a healthy home-work life. The added pressures of working mothers rests on the stereotypical, gendered assumptions that women are the prime care takers of children, which is a fact that is often reflected in privileges and advantages in the work place between men and women. This is where the disadvantages of the motherhood penalty, the wage gap, and the second shift come into play (Wade). When women are hired, they are assumed to have more home life responsibilities that can interfere with their ability to do well at work. Relating to their male counterparts, if women want to provide more for their family, they are to take on the masculine work ethic. That is, be more aggressive, and put work before your family. An increase in work demands may alleviate the burden of economic decreases; however, this takes away the time needed to raise a family. With 66% of married women in a dual-income family, that percentage illustrates that, although both parents are economic providers for their family, the women take on both work and family responsibilities to cooperate with society’s gender roles. Research shows consistence with utility maximization theory, that women are not merely opting out of the workforce, but rather are accurately assessing the potential opportunity and direct labor market costs of their decisions to withdraw based on measurable advantages and disadvantages.

In Europe, Ireland and the Netherlands have some of the strongest housewife traditions. In the early 1980s, the Commission of the European Communities report Women in the European Community, found that the Netherlands and Ireland had the lowest labour participation of married women, and the most public disapproval of it. In the Netherlands, from the 1990s onwards, the number of women entering the workplace have increased, yet with most of the women only working part time. According to The Economist, in the Netherlands, fewer men had to fight in the World Wars of the 20th century, and so Dutch women did not experience working for pay at rates women in other countries did. The wealth of the country, coupled with the fact that "[Dutch] politics was dominated by Christian values until the 1980s" meant that Dutch women were slower to enter into the workforce. In contrast to the mid-20th century Western Europe, Communist countries such as USSR and Mainland China encouraged married women to keep working after they had given birth. In the US, after the feminist movement (accompanied by the civil rights movement against the racial discrimination and The Vietnam War), there were 50% of married women who kept working after they given birth in 1978 in the USA; in 1997, the number was 61%. Increased numbers of housewives happened in the Bush era in the 2000s. After the 2008 financial crisis, because of a decrease in family income, women kept working to help their families, there were 69% Married women who kept working after they had given birth in 2009 in the USA.

As more countries joined the European Union, and became subject to its directives, the policies regarding women's labour rights improved throughout Europe. Noteworthy directives include the Employment Equality Framework Directive, the Pregnant Workers Directive, the Parental Leave Directive and the Directive 2002/73/EC - equal treatment of 23 September 2002 amending Council Directive 76/207/EEC on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions.

Working Fathers: child support, alimony, single fathers and the occasional struggle to fully identify with kids, balancing time between work and home life, homosexual fathers

Working Fathers


Mommy Wars: stay-at-home vs outside work vs breadwinner moms, touch on feminist views of these matters,

Mommy Wars

The battle between working mothers and stay-at-home moms has been called the "mommy wars". Arguments center around the most effective use of one's time in raising children.Leslie Morgan Steiner wrote that, as women struggle to come to terms with their own choices in parenting against society’s standards, they engage in this warfare that does nothing to promote self-acceptance, acceptance of others or balance within their individual lives."

The battle between working mothers and stay-at-home moms has been named the "mommy wars". Arguments between these two types of mothers center around the most effective use of one's time when raising children. Leslie Morgan Steiner wrote that, "as women struggle to come to terms with their own choices in parenting against society’s standards, they engage in this warfare that does nothing to promote self-acceptance, acceptance of others or balance within their individual lives."^ Disagreements about what workforce opportunities do to the stigma of being a housewife focus on values (Wade).

?Research Studies: add statistics of working parents in a comparison of a few countries, focus on the U.S. . Add stats on the percentage of mothers who work outside and do all or most housework. Maybe include stats on working welfare parents

  1. ^ "Employment Characteristics of Families Summary". U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved 2011-10-22.