User:Halcharbonneau/Evaluate an Article
Which article are you evaluating?[edit]
Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?[edit]
I chose to evaluate this article because it is World Antimicrobial Awareness Week. Antimicrobial stewardship promotes the appropriate and responsible use of antimicrobial agents. Antibiotic resistance poses a serious threat to public health by developing resistant strains from overuse. Pharmacists play a crucial role in ensuring their effectiveness while minimizing the development of resistance. This includes not overprescribing or treating with prolonged courses that are unnecessary. In addition, the right antimicrobial should be selected based on patient-specific factors, including the type of infection and pathogen involved. My preliminary impression is that it's a comprehensive article covering various aspects such as the definition, goals, history, participants, interventions, and measurable outcomes. It is a good starting point to understand the complexity of antimicrobial stewardship.
Evaluate the article[edit]
The lead includes an introductory section that is concise, not overly detailed, and clearly describes the article's topic. It defines antimicrobial stewardship as the systematic effort to educate and persuade prescribers of antimicrobials to follow evidence-based prescribing to halt antibiotic overuse and resistance. The lead includes a brief description of the article's main goals of ASM, the participants involved, and where they are needed. It mainly focuses on the history of implementation and laws but does not include a brief description of them.
The article's content is relevant, with research dating back to the previous 10 years. It presents the information factually and objectively with no clear indication of bias. It does not attempt to persuade the reader towards any particular position and provides a balanced viewpoint by discussing ASM's benefits and controversies.
The sources provided cover a range of information and include some reputable entities such as the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA), the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) and government bodies such as the CDC. The dates of the sources provided vary, with some dating back to 2007 and others as recent as 2022; therefore, they may not reflect the available literature, especially in a rapidly evolving field. The authors are not always explicitly provided; some sources are institutional guidelines and news articles. The links to the references appear to work.
It is clear, well-written, and easy to read, effectively using subheadings to enhance readability. The information is presented logically, from the definition and goals to its history, key milestones, and implementation. The history section is in chronological order and flows nicely, and the authors also use bullet points when necessary to break down information. There are no major grammatical or spelling errors.
This article does not include any images. Including relevant, well-captioned, and visually appealing images could enhance the understanding of the topic of antimicrobial stewardship. The only topic discussed in the article's talk page is using AMP and ASP abbreviations with the same meaning, including which is appropriately defined and why AMSP is not used.
Overall, the article provides a good baseline understanding of antimicrobial stewardship. It also addresses the multidisciplinary nature of ASM, involving infectious disease specialists, pharmacists, physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and other healthcare professionals. It discusses ASM beyond a hospital setting, such as outpatient clinics, long-term care facilities, and veterinary medicine. It covers vital aspects, maintains a neutral tone, and has decently relevant references to support its statements. To further enhance this article, more frequent updates to align with the latest research and guidelines would be beneficial, as well as incorporating images and media to increase engagement and enhance understanding and credibility.