Jump to content

User:GraceHarnett21/Amazon Kindle/Noellemary96 Peer Review

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Peer review[edit]

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info[edit]

Lead[edit]

  • The lead does reflect the content of the article sufficiently

Lead evaluation[edit]

Content[edit]

  • The content added is relevant to the topic and up-to-date.
  • The article does not deal with any equity or underrepresented issues, but gives additional appropriate information on the Goodreads and Kindle partnership.

Content evaluation[edit]

Tone and Balance[edit]

  • The is content added is neutral and fact based.
  • It could be argued that the tone is slightly on the positive side, but that is in line with the sources.

Tone and balance evaluation[edit]

Sources and References[edit]

  • The source used for this entry is from 2016 on Goodreads which explains how to use the tech on a kindle.
  • The link works.
  • In the future if there are other available sources about the subject that could give more context to the development and reception of the partnership.

Sources and references evaluation[edit]

Organization[edit]

  • Is the content added is well-written and easy to read.
  • There are no grammatical or spelling errors.
  • The added content is limited to three sentences but is properly organised.

Organisation evaluation[edit]

Images and Media[edit]

  • No images or media added

Overall impressions[edit]

  • The content has added more context to the Amazon Kindle article and will provide easy answers for anyone looking on the wiki page.
  • If there are more sources from other authors to add that would be beneficial to back up the information.
  • Overall a strong and useful submission.

Overall evaluation[edit]