User:GraceHarnett21/Amazon Kindle/Noellemary96 Peer Review
Appearance
Peer review[edit]
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.
General info[edit]
- GraceHarnett21
- Link to draft: Amazon Kindle
Lead[edit]
- The lead does reflect the content of the article sufficiently
Lead evaluation[edit]
Content[edit]
- The content added is relevant to the topic and up-to-date.
- The article does not deal with any equity or underrepresented issues, but gives additional appropriate information on the Goodreads and Kindle partnership.
Content evaluation[edit]
Tone and Balance[edit]
- The is content added is neutral and fact based.
- It could be argued that the tone is slightly on the positive side, but that is in line with the sources.
Tone and balance evaluation[edit]
Sources and References[edit]
- The source used for this entry is from 2016 on Goodreads which explains how to use the tech on a kindle.
- The link works.
- In the future if there are other available sources about the subject that could give more context to the development and reception of the partnership.
Sources and references evaluation[edit]
Organization[edit]
- Is the content added is well-written and easy to read.
- There are no grammatical or spelling errors.
- The added content is limited to three sentences but is properly organised.
Organisation evaluation[edit]
Images and Media[edit]
- No images or media added
Overall impressions[edit]
- The content has added more context to the Amazon Kindle article and will provide easy answers for anyone looking on the wiki page.
- If there are more sources from other authors to add that would be beneficial to back up the information.
- Overall a strong and useful submission.