Jump to content

User:GrabUp/XfD log

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a log of all deletion discussion nominations made by this user using Twinkle's XfD module.

If you no longer wish to keep this log, you can turn it off using the preferences panel, and nominate this page for speedy deletion under CSD U1.

May 2024

[edit]
  1. Lika O: nominated at AfD; notified Moharavi (talk · contribs) 05:36, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Requested by Demeter39G, Here: The article does not meet the notability criteria and merit. The 1 source is not a reliable source that verifies notability. It is a forum like site for local community, which serves as self published blog.http://ruhollywood.com/2018/11/12/miss-russian-united-states/
      4 source is a self published interview on an ads website, not reliable secondary source at all. http://www.spektrummagazine.com/fashion/getting-to-know-lika-osipova/
      6 source is an article on a gossips site about dating life of a Russian media person, barelly mentioning the figure of the Wikipedia. https://www.eg.ru/showbusiness/66399/
      Sources 7 and 8 are different links to the same poster to the city of the city. It is rather a primary sourse not a secondary source to verify notability. https://www.weho.org/home/showdocument?id=26793
      Source 9 - a link to the so called LAF.It is not a film festival, it is a monthly paid competition, not recognized in media or the professional community. The link only mentions name of the person, and does not provide any evidence to verify notability. https://www.lafilmawards.net/single-post/june-2021
      To summarize- 6 out of 9 sources used for the page do not meet even closely any possible notability verifications. The figure has barely any professional credits, zero recognition in American or Russian media beyond a self proclaimed pop star status.
  2. Supersci: nominated at AfD; notified L.A.Nutti (talk · contribs) 18:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Nominated by an IP user: Non-notable group, going by available sources. Both with its current ("Supersci") and its former ("Superscientifiku") name, the group is mentioned on some Swedish websites, but with very few exceptions (e.g. ) either these sources are non-reliable, or the subject is mentioned only in passing.
  3. Vegetable Market Workers Union: nominated at AfD; notified Soman (talk · contribs) 02:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: I looked for reliable sources and books but couldn't find anything. The article can be redirected.
  4. Bago University Students' Union: nominated at AfD; notified Aidanag Narak (talk · contribs) 10:02, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
  5. Hunan Coal Group: nominated at AfD; notified Ctxz2323 (talk · contribs) 12:10, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
  6. Paul Chantler: nominated at AfD; notified J97736 (talk · contribs) 12:23, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
  7. Mirai (band): nominated at AfD; notified M97uzivatel (talk · contribs) 12:35, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

[edit]
  1. Hari Ballabh Narayan Singh: nominated at AfD; notified Archivehindu (talk · contribs) 16:22, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: The author challenged the draftification done by Zinnober9. Based on my check, I don’t think the subject meets WP:GNG, WP:AUTHOR, or any other notability criteria. I looked for reliable sources but did not find any. If anyone finds sources in Hindi or other languages, you are welcome to share them here. His books are also not notable. In my opinion, there is no need for draftification anymore.

July 2024

[edit]
  1. Cyber Crime Break: nominated at AfD; notified द्वारा (talk · contribs) 14:59, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: A Draft:Cyber Crime Break was declined multiple times, but the author created it to the main space to bypass AfC reviewing. I also declined the draft earlier. Based on my review, I can't find any sources with significant coverage of the subject just passing mentions and promotions. The organization was just created, and the article seems to exist solely to promote or publicize the organization. I don't think the article meets WP:GNG
      , WP:ORG, or any other notability criteria that would justify keeping it. Draftification is not a good idea since the author has bypassed the AfC process by moving the article to the main space despite multiple declines by several reviewers.
  2. Basen Murmu: nominated at AfD; notified ᱤᱧ ᱢᱟᱛᱟᱞ (talk · contribs) 07:40, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: There is no evidence of notability. The previous AfD was closed as a soft delete. I searched for reliable, independent sources with significant information but found nothing to establish the subject as notable.

August 2024

[edit]
  1. Priyanka (actress): nominated at AfD; notified Rajal.Barringh23 (talk · contribs) 06:22, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Clearly a case of WP:BLP1E; the sources are only due to his death. Additionally, she is not a lead actress in any notable film.
  2. Sourav Mukherjee: nominated at AfD; notified Kolkata.cult (talk · contribs) 14:41, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: No independent, reliable secondary sources found. Fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. Sources includes primary, blogs such as Medium and unreliable sources.
  3. Jharkhand Andolankari Sangharsh Morcha: nominated at AfD; notified Buddy Bio (talk · contribs) 17:28, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: The sources are not reliable and do not provide in-depth coverage of the subject. It fails to meet the criteria of WP:GNG and WP:ORG.
  4. Taraba News: nominated at AfD; notified Jayofpedia (talk · contribs) 10:38, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: No indication of notability. There are zero reliable secondary sources; the sources include blogs and primary sources, which contribute nothing towards establishing notability. The article also appears promotional, but I chose to take it to AfD rather than tag it under WP:G11. It fails both WP:GNG and WP:ORG.
  5. Manish Chandra: nominated at AfD; notified Captain sparrow199 (talk · contribs) 07:39, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: The person does not meet WP:GNG or any other notability criteria. The sources do not provide WP:SIGCOV
      and are merely passing mentions, with quotes from the subject and similar content.
  6. Taufan: nominated at AfD; notified Dorothy Schnapp (talk · contribs) 07:43, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Unable to find WP:SIGCOV sources, and the article fails to meet WP:GNG or WP:NFILM criteria. It can be redirected to the director's article, but it needs some reliable source to exist.
  7. Hosenul Islam: nominated at AfD; notified মোঃ আহসান হাবিব রিফাত (talk · contribs) 18:04, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Unable to find reliable, significant sources, I previously suggested the author to submit the article through AfC. He then moved it to the Draft space, but now he has moved it back to the main space without getting it reviewed through AfC, which is not mandatory. The article does not cite reliable sources. Blog posts, user-generated articles like Medium, and similar platforms are unreliable. The article fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV.

September 2024

[edit]
  1. Premier Energies Limited: nominated at AfD; notified Njoy deep (talk · contribs) 13:48, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: The subject is receiving attention due to its recent IPO. Anyways, after searching for in-depth coverage from independent, reliable secondary sources, I was unable to find any. The cited sources are trivial, as per WP:ORGTRIV, and the subject does not meet the criteria outlined in WP:NCORP or WP:GNG.
  2. Shaykh Ashabul Yamin: nominated at AfD; notified SabujHossainBD001 (talk · contribs) 06:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Clearly, the case of WP:BLP1E involves sources that are based on a single event, his death. If significant sources from before his death can be found, then the article can be kept.
  3. Jitendra Dhaka: nominated at AfD; notified Pokebird (talk · contribs) 06:23, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Sources do not meet the criteria for WP:SIGCOV, and the subject fails to meet the requirements of WP:GNG.
  4. Aaragan: nominated at AfD; notified Monhiroe (talk · contribs) 12:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: The article does not meet WP:GNG as no in-depth coverage of the subject has been found from reliable independent sources. The cited sources are mostly unreliable, and the reliable sources only provide passing mentions. Additionally, the article fails to meet WP:NFILM. It could potentially be recreated if multiple reviews from reliable independent sources are published after its release.