User:EliseSembach/Choose an Article
Article Selection
[edit]Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.
Option 1
[edit]- Article title
- Alter ego
- Article Evaluation
Pretty vague, doesn't define the topic as much as It should, rather focuses on examples from movies and fiction, could apply more to real world and give real life examples.
- Sources
quite a lot of different sources, pretty strong sources but could use them to their advantage more in the text
Option 2
[edit]- Article title
- GreenWood
- Article Evaluation
Doesn't describe the amusement park and the rides to full extent, vague, the awards section is not as complete as it could be, could list more information about rides and when it initially opened compared to now
Sources
Large list of sources but doesn't seem to have used the sources in the text, not sure the quality of the sources
Option 3
[edit]- Article title
- Alaska Passage
- Article Evaluation
no pictures, doesn't give a good idea of what the movie is like or about, very vague, doesn't share significance
- Sources
large list of sources for how little information is present
Option 4
[edit]- Article title
- Riverwalk
- Article Evaluation
the article serves as a connection to list out all the specific river walks in the world, however it does not truly define what a river walk is or give examples by pictures, it serves as a directory rather than an actually giving one an idea of what a river walk is.
- Sources
No sources listed as it serves as a directory
Option 5
[edit]- Article title
- Alt for Damerne
- Article Evaluation
this is a danish women's magazine, as someone from Denmark who speaks Danish fluently I do not feel like this article serves it enough justice, it is very vague with no pictures or example of what the text generally looks like, but rather what/when it started publication, which is not enough, there should be a picture, maybe an example of an article or any other information that should be put in there that other major magazines have on their wiki pages
- Sources
A lot of different sources, but it seems to be uneven compared to the amount of content in the article