Jump to content

User:Chimericmacandcheese/I Have No Mouth, and I Must Scream/Fabiolabaeza465 Peer Review

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

General info[edit]

Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)

Link to draft you're reviewing
Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Peer Review[edit]

Guiding questions: • Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes, there is a slight change in the lead. • Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, there is a concise introduction to the article’s topic. • Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes, there is article section with an info box. • Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No. • Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? The lead is concise, perhaps a bit more detail on book’s themes or questions it raises.


Content Guiding questions: • Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes. • Is the content added up-to-date? Yes. • Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No • Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? No to both questions. Tone and Balance Guiding questions: • Is the content added neutral? Yes, it has it steady pace. • Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? As mentioned by previous reviewer, avoiding subjective words would be ideal. • Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No, it’s mostly well-rounded • Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No.


Sources and References Guiding questions: • Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes. • Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.) Yes. • Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes. • Are the sources current? Yes. • Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? No to both. • Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.) • Check a few links. Do they work? Yes, to all.


Organization

Guiding questions: • Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? • Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? • Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Images and Media Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media • Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes, 2 in total. • Are images well-captioned? • Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes • Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes. • How can the content added be improved? Yes, it can use more content.

P.S.[edit]

Sorry about the format! I'm not familiar with Source Editing and Wikipedia won't allow me switch to visual editor :-(

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Chimericmacandcheese/I_Have_No_Mouth,_and_I_Must_Scream/Fabiolabaeza465_Peer_Review&oldid=1017841984"