Template talk:Political divisions of Bosnia and Herzegovina

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconBosnia and Herzegovina Template‑class
WikiProject iconPolitical divisions of Bosnia and Herzegovina is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

I think that Brčko District have some municipalities too. Their names should be listed here. PANONIAN (talk) 17:26, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, read the Final Award. It's linked to in the notes in the infobox in the Republika Srpska article.--estavisti 01:45, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Official Names are Bosanska Kostajnica and Bosanski Bord as stated by the Official RS web site[edit]

Look at the English version of the webstie: Official Repbulika Srpska Web site states that the town name is changed to Bosanski Brod. The Serbian version no one can read because it is in Cyrillic so they can write their own stuff. But for the official outside world they have the English version where it states that the official Municipality name is changed back to Bosanski Bord.

Thank You, Kseferovic Kseferovic 05:55, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It says that according to the Constituional Court of BiH all of the towns causing issues have retunred the former names. Check the list. This even says on the RS Web site.

Check once again:Republika Srpska Government Web site

Thanks and I am serious, Kseferovic Kseferovic 05:55, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No underline...?[edit]

This is a fine template; anyone else, though, feel underlining the title is unnecessary and perhaps detracts from its effect...?  Regards, David Kernow (talk) 21:41, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...Have removed underlining; hope this okay. David Kernow (talk) 23:50, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]