Template talk:Easter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconChristianity Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Can somebody, ANYBODY, add Easter Rising???[edit]

h

Please no. tahc chat 11:11, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 3 March 2020[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.



194.254.24.109 (talk) 16:50, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paques est une fête célébrée internationalement, et elle a perdu son côté religieux: de nos jours, il s'agit plusd'une tradition que d'une fête a but de foi.

Not a matter for this template, you can suggest edits on the talk page of the French Wikipedia. – Thjarkur (talk) 18:41, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

missing[edit]

I don't think I ever looked at this template which I think is hard to read, sorry. Where is Passion (music)? Why a few individual hymns for Easter but not List of Easter hymns? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:02, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It has been expanded to three levels since you wrote this, but I still don't see Passion (music) in there. List of Easter hymns has now been linked from one of the intermediate headings. When I clean up the template soon, I will see if I can use Template:Christmas as model at least for the music section. ◅ Sebastian Helm 🗨 06:12, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This navbox used to be much more useful...[edit]

... and understandable. Here is a not-too-long-ago version before wording and concepts were moved and complicated. Maybe someone can bring some of that back to the template, or better yet just revert to this form and add some of the minor edits or additions made since, thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:56, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Still the same concern, many of the words are not understandable or familiar to most readers, and the simplicity of the navbox is lost (see above link for how the navbox used to look and was an easy read). Randy Kryn (talk) 10:35, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. I just removed one subset of these complications before I noticed this discussion, and will consult the diffs to the version you brought up to do a more thorough job soon; hopefully today. ◅ Sebastian Helm 🗨 05:59, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]